留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

农业文化遗产地茶文化景观基因农户感知差异研究

程佳欣 孙业红 常谕

程佳欣, 孙业红, 常谕. 农业文化遗产地茶文化景观基因农户感知差异研究−以潮州单丛茶文化系统为例[J]. 中国生态农业学报 (中英文), 2023, 31(11): 1860−1872 doi: 10.12357/cjea.20230166
引用本文: 程佳欣, 孙业红, 常谕. 农业文化遗产地茶文化景观基因农户感知差异研究−以潮州单丛茶文化系统为例[J]. 中国生态农业学报 (中英文), 2023, 31(11): 1860−1872 doi: 10.12357/cjea.20230166
CHENG J X, SUN Y H, CHANG Y. Differences in the perceptions of farmers in the tea culture landscape genes of agricultural heritage sites: a case study of the Chaozhoudancong Tea culture system[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2023, 31(11): 1860−1872 doi: 10.12357/cjea.20230166
Citation: CHENG J X, SUN Y H, CHANG Y. Differences in the perceptions of farmers in the tea culture landscape genes of agricultural heritage sites: a case study of the Chaozhoudancong Tea culture system[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2023, 31(11): 1860−1872 doi: 10.12357/cjea.20230166

农业文化遗产地茶文化景观基因农户感知差异研究以潮州单丛茶文化系统为例

doi: 10.12357/cjea.20230166
基金项目: 国家自然科学基金项目(41971264)和潮州单丛茶申报全球重要农业文化遗产项目资助
详细信息
    作者简介:

    程佳欣, 主要从事农业文化遗产旅游方面研究。E-mail: cheng_jiaxin99@163.com

    通讯作者:

    孙业红, 主要研究方向为遗产旅游、可持续旅游、农业文化遗产动态保护、旅游资源开发与规划。E-mail: sunyehong@buu.edu.cn

  • 中图分类号: F59

Differences in the perceptions of farmers in the tea culture landscape genes of agricultural heritage sites: a case study of the Chaozhoudancong Tea culture system

Funds: This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41971264) and Chaozhoudancong Tea Nominated for Globally Important Agricultural Cultural Heritage Project.
More Information
  • 摘要: 农业文化遗产是一种活态遗产, 具有重要的社会价值、经济价值和生态价值, 文化景观特征鲜明, 识别其文化景观基因有着积极的意义。以景观基因理论和地方理论为基础, 以潮州单丛茶文化系统为例, 识别潮州单丛茶文化景观基因; 以农户为调研对象, 探讨茶文化景观基因与农户感知的内在联系, 挖掘不同生计类型农户对茶文化景观基因演变的感知差异。结果表明: 1)农户感知近十年茶园和村庄的生态环境、生活环境、茶种植工具和种植技术以及生活方式发生了显著的变化; 2)高山茶种植区的农户对山地、茶园、村庄的环境变化感知更为强烈, 低山茶种植区的农户对种植技术和知识的变化感知更为强烈; 3)生计策略为单一种茶的农户对“山地、台地面积变化”等指标的感知更强烈; 4)农户的茶叶总收入不同, 对茶文化景观生态基因感知也存在差异。可针对不同类型的农户提出增强其生计韧性的途径, 促进农户生态保护和遗产传承意识的提升, 为农业文化遗产地可持续发展提供思路。
  • 图  1  潮州单丛茶农业文化遗产茶文化景观基因构成

    Figure  1.  Chaozhoudancong Tea cultural system tea culture landscape genetic composition

    表  1  潮州单丛茶农业文化遗产茶文化景观基因感知调查指标

    Table  1.   Indicators of perceptual survey of tea culture landscape genes of Chaozhoudancong Tea cultural system

    指标 Index调查内容 Investigate index
    农户基本情况
    Basic information about the farmers
    性别 Gender
    年龄 Age
    文化程度 Educational level
    居住时间 Duration of residence
    健康状况 Health status
    生计策略 Livelihood strategy
    茶园类型 Type of tea plantation
    古茶树数量 Number of ancient tea plants
    “单株采单株制”茶树数量
    Number of “single-picked, single-produced” tea plants
    茶叶总收入 Total tea income
    生态基因
    Ecological gene
    山地、台地面积的变化
    Changes in mountain / terrace area
    山地、台地生态环境的变化
    Changes in mountain / terrace ecosystems
    河流流域面积的变化
    Changes in river basin area
    河流流量的变化 Changes in river flows
    森林面积的变化 Changes in forest area
    森林树种的变化 Changes in forest species
    古茶园面积的变化
    Changes in the area of ancient tea plantations
    古茶园数量的变化
    Changes in the number of ancient tea plantations
    茶园面积的变化
    Changes in the area of tea plantations
    茶园数量的变化
    Changes in the number of tea plantations
    茶园环境的变化
    Changes in the environment of tea plantations
    村庄面积的变化
    Changes in the size of villages
    村庄生态环境的变化
    Changes in the environment of villages
    村庄生活环境的变化
    Changes in the living environment in villages
    生产基因
    Production gene
    茶种植工具的变化
    Changes in the tools of tea growing
    茶种植技术的变化
    Changes in tea growing techniques
    茶种植知识的变化
    Changes in tea growing knowledge
    茶种植制度的变化
    Changes in the tea plantation system
    生活基因
    Living gene
    节庆习俗的变化 Changes in festive customs
    信仰崇拜的变化 Changes in worship
    村规民约的变化
    Changes in village rules and regulations
    生活方式的变化 Changes in lifestyle
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2  样本基本信息

    Table  2.   Basic information on the sample

    项目
    Item
    调查内容
    Survey content
    样本量
    Sample
    size
    比例
    Proportion
    (%)
    性别
    Gender
    男 Male 49 81.7
    女 Female 11 18.3
    年龄
    Age
    <18 1 1.7
    18~30 6 10.0
    31~45 25 41.7
    46~60 20 33.3
    ≥61 8 13.3
    文化程度
    Education level
    没上过学 Uneducated 3 5.0
    小学 Primary school 9 15.0
    初中
    Junior middle school
    32 53.3
    高中、中专
    High school / junior college
    14 23.3
    大学、大专
    University / post-secondary
    2 3.3
    生计策略
    Livelihood strategy
    种茶农民 Tea farmers 46 76.67
    种茶农民/其他
    Tea farmers / others
    9 15.0
    其他 Others 5 8.33
    健康状况
    Health status
    健康 Well-being 60 100.0
    非健康 Unhealthy 0 0
    是否为原住民
    Aboriginality or
    otherwise
    是 Yes 54 90.0
    否 No 6 10.0
    茶园类型
    Type of tea plantation
    高山茶
    High altitude tea
    33 55.0
    低山茶 Low altitude tea 27 45.0
    单株采单株制
    Single-picked,
    single-produced (plants)
    0 20 33.3
    1~50 32 53.3
    51~100 5 8.3
    ≥101 3 5.0
    古茶树
    Ancient tea tree
    (plants)
    0 31 51.7
    1~50 9 15.0
    51~100 4 6.7
    101~200 7 11.7
    ≥201 9 15.0
    茶叶总收入
    Total tea income
    (×104 ¥)
    ≤50 22 36.7
    51~100 11 18.3
    101~200 9 15.0
    201~300 11 18.3
    ≥301 7 11.7
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  3  潮州单丛茶农业文化遗产景观基因感知描述性分析

    Table  3.   Descriptive analysis of landscape genetic perception of Chaozhoudancong Tea cultural system

    景观基因类型
    Landscape genotypes
    题目
    Subject
    平均值
    Average
    标准差
    Standard deviation
    中位数
    Median
    生态基因
    Ecological gene
    山地、台地面积变化 Changes in mountain / terrace area2.9171.2392.000
    山地、台地生态环境变化 Changes in mountain / terrace ecosystems4.1170.9044.000
    河流流域变化 Changes in river basin area3.4501.3584.000
    河流水量变化 Changes in river flows3.4501.3584.000
    森林面积变化 Changes in forest area2.9671.2622.500
    森林树种变化 Changes in forest species2.8001.0863.000
    古茶园面积变化 Changes in the area of ancient tea plantations2.1501.4361.000
    古茶园数量变化 Changes in the number of ancient tea plantations2.1501.4361.000
    茶园面积变化 Changes in the area of tea plantations2.9001.5702.000
    茶园数量变化 Changes in the number of tea plantations2.8501.5602.000
    茶园环境变化 Changes in the environment of tea plantations4.0170.9834.000
    村庄面积变化 Changes in the size of villages2.2671.0872.000
    村庄生态环境变化 Changes in the ecology of villages4.3500.7774.000
    村庄生活环境变化 Changes in the living environment in villages4.5170.6245.000
    生产基因
    Production gene
    茶种植工具变化 Changes in the tools of tea growing4.0670.9544.000
    茶种植技术变化 Changes in tea growing techniques3.8671.1424.000
    茶种植知识变化 Changes in tea growing knowledge2.1830.9112.000
    茶种植制度变化 Changes in the tea plantation system1.1170.3241.000
    生活基因
    Living gene
    节庆习俗变化 Changes in festive customs1.0830.5301.000
    信仰崇拜变化 Changes in worship1.1170.4901.000
    村规民约变化 Changes in village rules and regulations1.7830.7392.000
    生活方式变化 Changes in lifestyle3.6671.2584.000
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  4  潮州单丛茶农业文化遗产景观基因变化满意度描述性分析

    Table  4.   Descriptive analysis of satisfaction with genetic change in the landscape of Chaozhoudancong Tea cultural system

    景观基因类型
    Landscape genotype
    题目
    Subject
    平均值
    Average
    标准差
    Standard deviations
    中位数
    Median
    生态基因
    Ecological gene
    山地、台地面积变化 Changes in mountain / terrace area3.9670.5814.000
    山地、台地生态环境变化 Changes in mountain / terrace ecosystems4.1831.0334.000
    河流流域变化 Changes in river basin area3.3331.2033.500
    河流水量变化 Changes in river flows3.3331.2033.500
    森林面积变化 Changes in forest area3.6000.9424.000
    森林树种变化 Changes in forest species3.5330.9114.000
    古茶园面积变化 Changes in the area of ancient tea plantations3.5500.9463.500
    古茶园数量变化 Changes in the number of ancient tea plantations3.5500.9463.500
    茶园面积变化 Changes in the area of tea plantations4.0500.7904.000
    茶园数量变化满意 Changes in the number of tea plantations4.0170.8334.000
    茶园环境变化 Changes in the environment of tea plantations4.2001.0224.500
    村庄面积变化 Changes in the size of villages3.8170.5964.000
    村庄生态环境变化 Changes in the ecology of villages4.3500.9715.000
    村庄生活环境变化 Changes in the living environment in villages4.5670.6985.000
    生产基因
    Production gene
    茶种植工具变化 Changes in the tools of tea growing4.3830.6134.000
    茶种植技术变化 Changes in tea growing techniques4.3670.6374.000
    茶种植知识变化 Changes in tea growing knowledge4.0830.4974.000
    茶种植制度变化 Changes in the tea plantation system4.7000.5305.000
    生活基因
    Living gene
    节庆习俗变化 Changes in festive customs4.0500.5944.000
    信仰崇拜变化 Changes in worship4.0500.6494.000
    村规民约变化 Changes in village rules and regulations4.2500.7044.000
    生活方式变化 Changes in lifestyle4.6330.5205.000
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  5  不同茶园类型农户对景观基因感知的差异

    Table  5.   Differences in the perception of landscape genetics among farmers with different tea plantation types

    景观基因类型
    Landscape genotype
    题目
    Subject
    感知程度
    Level of perception
    户数
    Households number
    P
    高山茶
    High altitude tea
    低山茶
    Low altitude tea
    生态基因
    Ecological gene
    山地、台地面积变化
    Changes in mountain / terrace area
    13(9.09)2(7.41)0.046*
    212(36.36)15(55.56)
    32(6.06)0(0.00)
    415(45.45)5(18.52)
    51(3.03)5(18.52)
    山地、台地生态环境变化
    Changes in mountain / terrace ecosystems
    22(6.06)4(14.81)0.000**
    31(3.03)2(7.41)
    410(30.30)19(70.37)
    520(60.61)2(7.41)
    河流流域变化
    Changes in river basin area
    11(3.03)5(18.52)0.008**
    24(12.12)10(37.04)
    31(3.03)1(3.70)
    414(42.42)9(33.33)
    513(39.39)2(7.41)
    河流水量变化
    Changes in river flows
    11(3.03)5(18.52)0.008**
    24(12.12)10(37.04)
    31(3.03)1(3.70)
    414(42.42)9(33.33)
    513(39.39)2(7.41)
    森林树种变化
    Changes in forest species
    12(6.06)3(11.11)0.046*
    28(24.24)16(59.26)
    39(27.27)3(11.11)
    412(36.36)4(14.81)
    52(6.06)1(3.70)
    古茶园面积变化
    Changes in the area of ancient tea plantations
    17(21.21)24(88.89)0.000**
    29(27.27)1(3.70)
    32(6.06)1(3.70)
    410(30.30)1(3.70)
    55(15.15)0(0.00)
    古茶园数量变化
    Changes in the number of ancient tea plantations
    17(21.21)24(88.89)0.000**
    29(27.27)1(3.70)
    32(6.06)1(3.70)
    410(30.30)1(3.70)
    55(15.15)0(0.00)
    茶园环境变化
    Changes in the environment of tea plantations
    23(9.09)6(22.22)0.001**
    30(0.00)1(3.70)
    412(36.36)18(66.67)
    518(54.55)2(7.41)
    村庄生态环境变化
    Changes in the ecology of villages
    21(3.03)2(7.41)0.041*
    30(0.00)2(7.41)
    411(33.33)15(55.56)
    521(63.64)8(29.63)
    村庄生活环境变化
    Changes in the living environment in villages
    20(0.00)1(3.70)0.002**
    30(0.00)1(3.70)
    47(21.21)17(62.96)
    526(78.79)8(29.63)
    生产基因
    Production gene
    茶种植技术变化
    Changes in tea growing techniques
    13(9.09)0(0.00)0.026*
    27(21.21)1(3.70)
    31(3.03)0(0.00)
    411(33.33)19(70.37)
    511(33.33)7(25.93)
    茶种植知识变化
    Changes in tea growing knowledge
    18(24.24)0(0.00)0.019*
    219(57.58)24(88.89)
    30(0.00)1(3.70)
    44(12.12)2(7.41)
    52(6.06)0(0.00)
    茶种植制度变化
    Changes in the tea plantation system
    132(96.97)21(77.78)0.021*
    21(3.03)6(22.22)
      *表示P<0.05水平差异显著; **表示P<0.01水平差异显著。括号内数值表示该分类的被调查者占总人数的百分比。* represents significant differences at P<0.05 level; ** represents significant differences at P<0.01 level. The value in the bracket is the percentage of respondents in that classification of the total respondents.
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  6  不同茶园类型农户对景观基因变化满意度的差异

    Table  6.   Differences in the satisfaction with landscape genetic changes among farmers with different tea plantation types

    景观基因类型
    Landscape genotype
    题目
    Subject
    满意度
    Satisfaction
    户数
    Households number
    P
    高山茶
    High altitude tea
    低山茶
    Low altitude tea
    生态基因
    Ecological gene
    山地、台地生态环境变化
    Changes in mountain / terrace ecosystems
    10(0.00)1(3.70)0.022*
    20(0.00)6(22.22)
    31(3.03)2(7.41)
    412(36.36)9(33.33)
    520(60.61)9(33.33)
    河流流域变化
    Changes in river basin area
    12(6.06)0(0.00)0.013*
    214(42.42)4(14.81)
    35(15.15)5(18.52)
    410(30.30)8(29.63)
    52(6.06)10(37.04)
    河流水量变化
    Changes in river flows
    12(6.06)0(0.00)0.013*
    214(42.42)4(14.81)
    35(15.15)5(18.52)
    410(30.30)8(29.63)
    52(6.06)10(37.04)
    古茶园面积变化
    Changes in the area of ancient tea plantations
    18(24.24)0(0.00)0.000**
    22(6.06)20(74.07)
    412(36.36)7(25.93)
    511(33.33)0(0.00)
    古茶园数量变化
    Changes in the number of ancient tea plantations
    28(24.24)0(0.00)0.000**
    32(6.06)20(74.07)
    412(36.36)7(25.93)
    511(33.33)0(0.00)
    茶园数量变化
    Changes in the number of tea plantations
    20(0.00)6(22.22)0.032*
    31(3.03)1(3.70)
    424(72.73)13(48.15)
    58(24.24)7(25.93)
    茶园环境变化
    Changes in the environment of tea plantations
    20(0.00)8(29.63)0.002**
    30(0.00)2(7.41)
    412(36.36)8(29.63)
    521(63.64)9(33.33)
    生活基因
    Living gene
    信仰崇拜变化
    Changes in worship
    35(15.15)6(22.22)0.031*
    416(48.48)19(70.37)
    512(36.36)2(7.41)
      *表示P<0.05水平差异显著; **表示P<0.01水平差异显著。括号内数值表示该分类的被调查者占总人数的百分比。* represents significant differences at P<0.05 level; ** represents significant differences at P<0.01 level. The value in the bracket is the percentage of respondents in the classification of the total respondents.
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  7  不同生计方式的农户对景观基因变化感知的差异

    Table  7.   Differences in the perception of landscape genetic change among farmers with different livelihood strategies

    景观基因类型
    Landscape genotype
    题目
    Subject
    感知程度
    Level of perception
    户数
    Households number
    P
    种茶农民
    Tea farmers
    种茶农民/其他
    Tea farmers / others
    其他
    Others
    生态基因
    Ecological gene
    山地、台地面积变化
    Changes in mountain / terrace area
    12(4.35)3(33.33)0(0.00)0.039*
    221(45.65)3(33.33)3(60.00)
    31(2.17)0(0.00)1(20.00)
    418(39.13)2(22.22)0(0.00)
    54(8.70)1(11.11)1(20.00)
      *表示P<0.05水平差异显著。括号内数值表示该分类的被调查者占总人数的百分比。 * represents significant differences at P<0.05 level. The value in the bracket is the percentage of respondents in the classification of the total respondents.
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  8  不同生计策略农户在景观基因变化满意度中的差异

    Table  8.   Differences in the satisfaction with changes in landscape genetics among farmers with different livelihood strategies

    景观基因类型
    Landscape genotype
    题目
    Subject
    满意度
    Satisfaction
    户数
    Households number
    P
    种茶农民
    Tea farmers
    种茶农民/其他
    Tea farmers / others
    其他
    Others
    生产基因
    Production gene
    茶种植工具变化
    Changes in the tools of tea growing
    21(2.17)0(0.00)0(0.00)0.001**
    30(0.00)0(0.00)1(20.00)
    427(58.70)1(11.11)4(80.00)
    518(39.13)8(88.89)0(0.00)
      **表示P<0.01水平差异显著。括号内数值表示该分类的被调查者占总人数的百分比。** represents significant differences at P<0.01 level. Value in the bracket is the percentage of respondents in the classification of the total respondents.
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  9  不同收入农户对景观基因变化感知的差异

    Table  9.   Differences in the perception of landscape genetic changes in the landscape by farmers with different incomes

    景观基因类型
    Landscape genotype
    题目
    Subject
    感知程度
    Level of perception
    户数 Households numberP
    ≤50
    (×104 ¥)
    51~100
    (×104 ¥)
    101~200
    (×104 ¥)
    201~300
    (×104 ¥)
    ≥301
    (×104 ¥)
    生态基因
    Ecological gene
    山地、台地生态环境变化
    Changes in mountain / terrace ecosystems
    23(15.00)2(18.18)0(0.00)0(0.00)1(14.29)0.032*
    32(10.00)0(0.00)0(0.00)1(9.09)0(0.00)
    414(70.00)7(63.64)3(33.33)3(27.27)2(28.57)
    51(5.00)2(18.18)6(66.67)7(63.64)4(57.14)
    河流流域变化
    Changes in river basin area
    15(25.00)0(0.00)0(0.00)1(9.09)0(0.00)0.048*
    27(35.00)3(27.27)1(11.11)1(9.09)2(28.57)
    30(0.00)0(0.00)1(11.11)0(0.00)1(14.29)
    46(30.00)7(63.64)3(33.33)3(27.27)3(42.86)
    52(10.00)1(9.09)4(44.44)6(54.55)1(14.29)
    河流水量变化
    Changes in river flows
    15(25.00)0(0.00)0(0.00)1(9.09)0(0.00)0.048*
    27(35.00)3(27.27)1(11.11)1(9.09)2(28.57)
    30(0.00)0(0.00)1(11.11)0(0.00)1(14.29)
    46(30.00)7(63.64)3(33.33)3(27.27)3(42.86)
    52(10.00)1(9.09)4(44.44)6(54.55)1(14.29)
    古茶园面积变化
    Changes in the area of ancient tea plantations
    119(95.00)4(36.36)2(22.22)5(45.45)1(14.29)0.000**
    21(5.00)0(0.00)3(33.33)4(36.36)2(28.57)
    30(0.00)0(0.00)1(11.11)1(9.09)1(14.29)
    40(0.00)3(27.27)3(33.33)1(9.09)3(42.86)
    50(0.00)4(36.36)0(0.00)0(0.00)0(0.00)
    古茶园数量变化
    Changes in the number of ancient tea plantations
    119(95.00)4(36.36)2(22.22)5(45.45)1(14.29)0.000**
    21(5.00)0(0.00)3(33.33)4(36.36)2(28.57)
    30(0.00)0(0.00)1(11.11)1(9.09)1(14.29)
    40(0.00)3(27.27)3(33.33)1(9.09)3(42.86)
    50(0.00)4(36.36)0(0.00)0(0.00)0(0.00)
    茶园环境变化
    Changes in the environment of tea plantations
    23(15.00)2(18.18)2(22.22)1(9.09)1(14.29)0.005**
    31(5.00)0(0.00)0(0.00)0(0.00)0(0.00)
    415(75.00)9(81.82)1(11.11)3(27.27)2(28.57)
    51(5.00)0(0.00)6(66.67)7(63.64)4(57.14)
    村庄面积变化
    Changes in the size of villages
    14(20.00)2(18.18)1(11.11)2(18.18)1(14.29)0.010*
    216(80.00)4(36.36)7(77.78)7(63.64)5(71.43)
    40(0.00)5(45.45)0(0.00)0(0.00)1(14.29)
    50(0.00)0(0.00)1(11.11)2(18.18)0(0.00)
    生产基因
    Production gene
    茶种植工具变化
    Changes in the tools of tea growing
    10(0.00)0(0.00)0(0.00)1(9.09)0(0.00)0.026*
    21(5.00)0(0.00)1(11.11)3(27.27)1(14.29)
    30(0.00)0(0.00)0(0.00)0(0.00)1(14.29)
    414(70.00)9(81.82)3(33.33)1(9.09)4(57.14)
    55(25.00)2(18.18)5(55.56)6(54.55)1(14.29)
    茶种植技术变化
    Changes in tea growing techniques
    10(0.00)0(0.00)2(22.22)1(9.09)0(0.00)0.007**
    21(5.00)0(0.00)1(11.11)2(18.18)3(42.86)
    30(0.00)0(0.00)0(0.00)0(0.00)1(14.29)
    414(70.00)9(81.82)3(33.33)2(18.18)2(28.57)
    55(25.00)2(18.18)3(33.33)6(54.55)1(14.29)
    茶种植知识变化
    Changes in tea growing knowledge
    10(0.00)1(9.09)2(22.22)3(27.27)2(28.57)0.010*
    218(90.00)10(90.91)6(66.67)6(54.55)2(28.57)
    31(5.00)0(0.00)0(0.00)0(0.00)0(0.00)
    41(5.00)0(0.00)1(11.11)0(0.00)3(42.86)
    50(0.00)0(0.00)0(0.00)2(18.18)0(0.00)
      *表示P<0.05水平差异显著; **表示P<0.01水平差异显著。括号内数值表示该分类的被调查者占总人数的百分比。* represents significant differences at P<0.05 level; ** represents significant differences at P<0.01 level. The value in bracket is the percentage of respondents in the classification of the total respondents.
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  10  不同收入农户对景观基因变化满意度感知的差异

    Table  10.   Differences in the satisfaction with changes in landscape genetics among farmers with different incomes

    景观基因类型
    Landscape genotype
    题目
    Subject
    满意度
    Satisfaction
    户数 Households numberP
    50
    (×104 ¥)
    51~100
    (×104 ¥)
    101~200
    (×104 ¥)
    201~300
    (×104 ¥)
    ≥301
    (×104 ¥)
    生态基因
    Ecological gene
    山地、台地生态环境变化
    Changes in mountain / terrace ecosystems
    11(5.00)0(0.00)0(0.00)0(0.00)0(0.00)0.047*
    26(30.00)0(0.00)0(0.00)0(0.00)0(0.00)
    32(10.00)0(0.00)0(0.00)1(9.09)0(0.00)
    46(30.00)7(63.64)2(22.22)2(18.18)4(57.14)
    55(25.00)4(36.36)7(77.78)8(72.73)3(42.86)
    古茶园面积变化
    Changes in the area of ancient tea plantations
    20(0.00)5(45.45)1(11.11)1(9.09)1(14.29)0.000**
    315(75.00)3(27.27)2(22.22)1(9.09)1(14.29)
    45(25.00)3(27.27)5(55.56)4(36.36)2(28.57)
    50(0.00)0(0.00)1(11.11)5(45.45)3(42.86)
    古茶园数量变化
    Changes in the number of ancient tea plantations
    20(0.00)5(45.45)1(11.11)1(9.09)1(14.29)0.000**
    315(75.00)3(27.27)2(22.22)1(9.09)1(14.29)
    45(25.00)3(27.27)5(55.56)4(36.36)2(28.57)
    50(0.00)0(0.00)1(11.11)5(45.45)3(42.86)
    茶园环境变化
    Changes in the environment of tea plantations
    28(40.00)0(0.00)0(0.00)0(0.00)0(0.00)0.000**
    32(10.00)0(0.00)0(0.00)0(0.00)0(0.00)
    43(15.00)9(81.82)3(33.33)2(18.18)3(42.86)
    57(35.00)2(18.18)6(66.67)9(81.82)4(57.14)
    生产基因
    Production gene
    茶种植技术变化
    Changes in tea growing techniques
    21(5.00)0(0.00)0(0.00)0(0.00)0(0.00)0.016*
    30(0.00)0(0.00)0(0.00)0(0.00)2(28.57)
    412(60.00)7(63.64)6(66.67)2(18.18)3(42.86)
    57(35.00)4(36.36)3(33.33)9(81.82)2(28.57)
    生活基因
    Living gene
    信仰崇拜变化
    Changes in worship
    34(20.00)1(9.09)2(22.22)2(18.18)2(28.57)0.027*
    415(75.00)9(81.82)6(66.67)4(36.36)1(14.29)
    51(5.00)1(9.09)1(11.11)5(45.45)4(57.14)
      *表示P<0.05水平差异显著; **表示P<0.01水平差异显著。括号内数值表示该分类的被调查人数占总人数的百分比。* represents significant differences at P<0.05 level; ** represents significant differences at P<0.01 level. The value in the bracket is the percentage of respondents in the classification of the total f respondents.
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] 闵庆文, 孙业红. 农业文化遗产的概念、特点与保护要求[J]. 资源科学, 2009, 31(6): 914−918

    MIN Q W, SUN Y H. The concept, characteristics and conservation requirements of agro-cultural heritage[J]. Resources Science, 2009, 31(6): 914−918
    [2] 闵庆文, 骆世明, 曹幸穗, 等. 农业文化遗产: 连接过去与未来的桥梁[J]. 农业资源与环境学报, 2022, 39(5): 856−868

    MIN Q W, LUO S M, CAO X S, et al. Agri-cultural heritage: a bridge between past and the future[J]. Journal of Agricultural Resources and Environment, 2022, 39(5): 856−868
    [3] 吴灿, 王梦琪. 农业文化遗产景观美学的构成与自洽−以紫鹊界梯田为例[J]. 文艺论坛, 2022(4): 106−113

    WU C, WANG M Q. The composition and self-consistency of the aesthetics of agricultural cultural heritage landscapes: the example of the Ziquejie Terrace[J]. Literature and Art Forum, 2022(4): 106−113
    [4] 赵荣. 人文地理学[M]. 2版. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2006

    ZHAO R. Human Geography[M]. 2nd ed. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2006
    [5] 鲍青青, 钟泓, 谭燕瑜, 等. 中国南方稻作梯田农业文化遗产地文化景观基因特征−以广西龙胜龙脊梯田为例[J]. 社会科学家, 2021(10): 74−79

    BAO Q Q, ZHONG H, TAN Y Y, et al. Genetic characteristics of cultural landscape in agricultural cultural heritage sites of rice terraces in south China — A case study of Longji Terrace in Longsheng, Guangxi[J]. Social Scientist, 2021(10): 74−79
    [6] 吴福平, 李亚楠. 文化基因概念、理论及学术史批判[J]. 深圳社会科学, 2020(6): 96−103, 122

    WU F P, LI Y N. A criticism of cultural gene concept, theory and academic history[J]. Social Sciences in Shenzhen, 2020(6): 96−103, 122
    [7] TAYLOR G. Environment, village and city: a genetic approach to urban geography; with some reference to possibilism[J]. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 1942, 32(1): 1−67 doi: 10.1080/00045604209357229
    [8] 王恩涌. 漫谈风水−兼论俞孔坚教授新作《生物与文化基因上的图式−风水与理想景观》的深层意义[J]. 中学地理教学参考, 1998(Z2): 82−84

    WANG E Y. Ramblings on Feng Shui−Annotation on the deeper meaning of Professor Yu Kongjian’s new work “Patterns on Biological and Cultural Genes−Feng Shui and Ideal Landscapes”[J]. Secondary School Geography Teaching Reference, 1998(Z2): 82−84
    [9] 刘沛林. 古村落文化景观的基因表达与景观识别[J]. 衡阳师范学院学报, 2003, 24(4): 1−8

    LIU P L. The gene expression and the sight identification of the ancient villages’ cultural landscape[J]. Journal of Hengyang Normal University, 2003, 24(4): 1−8
    [10] 刘沛林, 刘春腊, 邓运员, 等. 中国传统聚落景观区划及景观基因识别要素研究[J]. 地理学报, 2010, 65(12): 1496−1506

    LIU P L, LIU C L, DENG Y Y, et al. Landscape division of traditional settlement and effect elements of landscape gene in China[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2010, 65(12): 1496−1506
    [11] 蒋思珩, 樊亚明, 郑文俊. 国内景观基因理论及其应用研究进展[J]. 西部人居环境学刊, 2021, 36(1): 84−91

    JIANG S H, FAN Y M, ZHENG W J. Research progress on landscape’s gene theory and its utilization in China[J]. Journal of Human Settlements in West China, 2021, 36(1): 84−91
    [12] 李世芬, 况源, 王佳林, 等. 渤海南域乡村民居建筑基因识别与图谱研究[J]. 建筑学报, 2022(S1): 219−224

    LI S F, KUANG Y, WANG J L, et al. Genetic identification and mapping of rural residential architecture in the southern Bohai Sea[J]. Journal of Architecture, 2022(S1): 219−224
    [13] 王成, 钟泓, 粟维斌. 聚落文化景观基因识别与谱系构建−以桂北侗族传统村落为例[J]. 社会科学家, 2022(2): 50−55

    WANG C, ZHONG H, SU W B. Genetic identification and pedigree construction of settlement cultural landscape — A case study of Dong traditional villages in northern Guangxi[J]. Social Scientist, 2022(2): 50−55
    [14] 郑文武, 李伯华, 刘沛林, 等. 湖南省传统村落景观群系基因识别与分区[J]. 经济地理, 2021, 41(5): 204−212 doi: 10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2021.05.022

    ZHENG W W, LI B H, LIU P L, et al. Gene identification and zoning of traditional village landscape groups in Hunan Province[J]. Economic Geography, 2021, 41(5): 204−212 doi: 10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2021.05.022
    [15] 梁琰, 王红崧. 元阳哈尼梯田农业文化遗产景观基因的挖掘和数字化表达[J]. 西南林业大学学报(自然科学), 2021(2): 17−22

    LIANG Y, WANG H S. Extraction and digital expression of landscape genes of agricultural cultural heritage in Yuanyang Hani Terrace[J]. Journal of Southwest Forestry University (Natural Sciences), 2021(2): 17−22
    [16] 李伯华, 刘敏, 刘沛林, 等. 景观基因信息链视角的传统村落风貌特征研究−以上甘棠村为例[J]. 人文地理, 2020, 35(4): 40−47

    LI B H, LIU M, LIU P L, et al. Research on the characteristics of traditional village style from the perspective of landscape genetic information chain: a case study of Shanggantang Village[J]. Human Geography, 2020, 35(4): 40−47
    [17] 胡最, 闵庆文, 刘沛林. 农业文化遗产的文化景观特征识别探索−以紫鹊界、上堡和联合梯田系统为例[J]. 经济地理, 2018, 38(2): 180−187

    HU Z, MIN Q W, LIU P L. Identification on cultural landscape of traditional rice terraces in the southern area of China[J]. Economic Geography, 2018, 38(2): 180−187
    [18] 向远林, 曹明明, 翟洲燕, 等. 陕西窑洞传统乡村聚落景观基因组图谱构建及特征分析[J]. 人文地理, 2019, 34(6): 82−90

    XIANG Y L, CAO M M, ZHAI Z Y, et al. The landscape genome maps construction and characteristics analysis of Shaanxi traditional rural cave dwelling settlements[J]. Human Geography, 2019, 34(6): 82−90
    [19] 饶滴滴, 刘某承, 闵庆文. 农业文化遗产系统景观要素分析的思考[J]. 自然与文化遗产研究, 2019, 4(11): 53−56

    RAO D D, LIU M C, MIN Q W. Thoughts on the analysis of landscape elements in agricultural heritage systems[J]. Study on Natural and Cultural Heritage, 2019, 4(11): 53−56
    [20] 白碧珍, 曹藩荣. 潮州凤凰单丛古树茶的生产概况[J]. 广东茶业, 2019, 165(3): 2−3

    BAI B Z, CAO F R. Production profile of Phoenix monocotyledonous old tree tea in Chaozhou[J]. Guangdong Tea Industry, 2019, 165(3): 2−3
    [21] 隆铭, 柯定国. 中国凤凰单丛[M]. 汕头: 汕头大学出版社, 2022

    LONG M, KE D G. Phoenix Monocarpa in China[M]. Shantou: Shantou University Press, 2022
    [22] 郑荣光. 饶平茶业三百年[M]. 广州: 广东人民出版社, 2010

    ZHENG R G. Three Hundred Years of Raoping Tea Industry[M]. Guangzhou: Guangdong People’s Publishing House, 2010
    [23] 刘沛林. 中国传统聚落景观基因图谱的构建与应用研究[D]. 北京: 北京大学, 2011

    LIU P L. The construction and application of a landscape gene map of traditional Chinese settlements[D]. Beijing: Peking University, 2011
    [24] 曹帅强, 邓运员, 杨载田, 等. 客家文化景观基因特征−以湖南省炎陵县为例[J]. 热带地理, 2014, 34(6): 831−841 doi: 10.13284/j.cnki.rddl.002631

    CAO S Q, DENG Y Y, YANG Z T, et al. Genetic characteristics of Hakka cultural landscape: a case study of Yanling, Hunan[J]. Tropical Geography, 2014, 34(6): 831−841 doi: 10.13284/j.cnki.rddl.002631
    [25] 杨波, 何露, 闵庆文. 文化景观视角下的农业文化遗产认知与保护研究−以云南双江勐库古茶园与茶文化系统为例[J]. 原生态民族文化学刊, 2020, 12(5): 110−116

    YANG B, HE L, MIN Q W. Cognition and protection of agricultural heritage from the per-spective of cultural landscape: a case study of the ancient tea garden and tea cultural system in Shuangjiang, Yunnan[J]. Journal of Original Ecological National Culture, 2020, 12(5): 110−116
  • 加载中
图(1) / 表(10)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  126
  • HTML全文浏览量:  83
  • PDF下载量:  32
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2023-03-30
  • 录用日期:  2023-06-19
  • 网络出版日期:  2023-08-10
  • 刊出日期:  2023-11-10

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回