农业要素市场化对农业面源污染的影响效应

刘明玉; 肖海峰

doi:10.12357/cjea.20230240

农业要素市场化对农业面源污染的影响效应兼议环境规制的调节作用

doi: 10.12357/cjea.20230240

刘明玉,
肖海峰^,

中国农业大学经济管理学院　北京　100083

基金项目: 农业农村部和财政部项目(CARS-39-22)资助

详细信息

作者简介:
刘明玉, 主要从事农场品市场与政策研究工作。E-mail: lmy0102@cau.edu.cn

通讯作者:
肖海峰, 主要从事农场品市场与政策研究工作。E-mail: haifengxiao@cau.edu.cn

中图分类号: F323.22
计量
- 文章访问数: 26
- HTML全文浏览量: 12
- PDF下载量: 0
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2023-05-05
- 录用日期: 2023-10-08
- 修回日期: 2023-10-23
- 网络出版日期: 2023-10-26

Effect of agricultural factor marketization on agricultural non-point source pollution: the regulatory role of environmental regulation

LIU Mingyu,
XIAO Haifeng^,

College of Economics and Management, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China

Funds: This study was supported by the project of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development and the Ministry of Finance (CARS-39-22).

More Information

Corresponding author: E-mail: haifengxiao@cau.edu.cn.

摘要

摘要: 本文探讨了在农业市场化改革背景下, 农业要素市场化对农业面源污染的影响效应、作用机制以及环境规制在其中的调节作用。基于2004—2020年中国省级(不含港澳台、西藏)面板数据, 构建了动态面板模型, 并运用差分广义矩阵及调节效应模型进行分析。研究结果表明: 1)农业要素市场化对面源污染呈现倒“U”型的动态演化特征; 2)机制分析表明, 农业要素市场化通过种植结构效应、化学品投入效应和经营规模效应间接影响面源污染; 具体而言, 农业要素市场化对“非粮化率”和化肥投入强度存在倒“U”型影响, 对人均经营规模的影响在市场化程度较高的后期显著为正; 3)环境规制在“非粮化率”和化肥投入强度的传导机制中具有显著的负向调节作用, 对经营规模与面源污染之间的传导关系不存在调节效应。因此, 本文提出要进一步发挥市场化改革对农业污染治理的长效机制, 立足农业面源污染治理“规模效应”“结构效应”和“投入品效应”的路径依赖, 构建“政府－市场”双轨运行机制, 以实现农业生态环境的改善和农业可持续发展。
- 农业要素市场化 /
- 环境规制 /
- 种植结构 /
- 化学品投入 /
- 经营规模 /
- 农业面源污染
Abstract: This study explores possible ways to mitigate agricultural surface pollution from the perspective of source management in the context of market-oriented reforms in agriculture, which is pioneered in this study. Based on China’s provincial-level (excluding Hong Kong, Macao, Taiwan and Tibet) panel data from 2004 to 2020, a dynamic panel model is constructed, and the differential generalized matrix estimation method is applied to explore the impact effect and transmission mechanism of agricultural factor marketization on non-point source pollution, and based on the theory of externality, to further analyze whether there is a moderating role of environmental regulation in the transmission mechanism. The analysis of impact effects shows that 1) the marketization of agricultural factors presents an inverted “U”-shaped dynamic evolution characteristic of non-point source pollution, which increases first and then decreases; 2) the analysis of mechanism shows that the marketization of agricultural factors indirectly affects non-point source pollution through the effects of planting structure, chemical inputs and scale of operation; in particular, the effect of marketization of agricultural factors marketisation on the “non-food rate” and fertiliser input intensity is in an inverted “U” shape; and the effect on the per capita scale of operation has no significant effect in the early stage of marketization, and is significantly positive in the later stage of higher marketization; 3) environmental regulation has a significant negative moderating effect on the transmission mechanism of “non-food rate” and fertilizer input intensity, and there is no moderating effect in the transmission relationship between scale of operation and non-point source pollution. Therefore, this study suggests to further play the role of market-oriented reform on the long-term mechanism of agricultural surface pollution management, based on the path-dependence of “scale effect”, “structural effect” and “input effect” of agricultural surface pollution management, and the role of market-oriented reform on the long-term mechanism of agricultural non-piont source pollution management, based on the path-dependence of “scale effect”, “structural effect” and “input effect”. Based on the “scale effect”, “structural effect” and “input effect” of agricultural non-point source pollution management, this study suggests to further play the role of market-oriented reform on the long-term mechanism of agricultural surface pollution management, and to build a dual-track operation mechanism of “government-market” to realize the improvement of agro-ecological environment and sustainable agricultural development.
- Marketization of agricultural factors /
- Environmental regulation /
- Planting structure /
- Chemical inputs /
- Scale of operation /
- Agricultural non-point source pollution

HTML全文

图 1 核心变量对农业面源污染的影响机制

Figure 1. Mechanism of influence of core variables on agricultural non-point source pollution

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 农业要素市场化评价指标体系

Table 1. Agricultural factor marketization evaluation index system

一级指标 First-order index	二级指标 Secondary index
农业劳动要素市场化 Marketization of agricultural labor elements	主要农作物单位面积雇工天数(d∙hm⁻²)和工资性收入占农村居民人均可支配收入的比重(%) Number of days of employment per unit area for major crops (d∙hm⁻²) and proportion of wage income per capita to disposable income per capita of rural residents (%)
农业土地要素市场化 Marketization of agricultural land elements	主要农作物单位面积流转地租金 Rent per unit area of major crops (¥∙hm⁻²)
农业资本要素市场化 Marketization of agricultural capital elements	农村住户固定资产投资占全社会固定资产投资的比重(%), 主要农作物每亩租赁服务费(¥∙hm⁻²)和农林水事务支出占地方财政支出的比重(%) Proportion of fixed asset investment of rural households in total social fixed asset investment (%), rental service fee per unit area of major crops (¥∙hm⁻²), and proportion of expenditure on agriculture, forestry and water conservancy affairs in local government expenditure (%)
主要农作物包括早籼稻(Oryza sativa subsp. Japonica)、中籼稻(Oryza sativa subsp. Indica)、晚籼稻(Oryza sativa subsp. Indica)、粳稻(Oryza sativa subsp. glutinosa)、小麦(Triticum aestivum L)、玉米(Zea mays L)、大豆(Glycine Willd)、棉花(Gossypium spp)、花生(Arachis hypogaea)、油菜籽(Brassica campestris Linn)、苹果(Malus domestica)、柑(Citrus tangerine)和桔(Citrus reticulata); 租赁服务费包括机械作业费、排灌费和畜力费。Major crops include early indica rice, middle indica rice, late indica rice, japonica rice, wheat, maize, soybean, cotton, peanut, rapeseed, apple, citrus and mandarin, and the leasing service fee include machinery operation fee, drainage and irrigation fee and animal power fee.

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 农业要素市场化对面源污染影响的基准回归及稳健性检验

Table 2. Benchmark regression and robustness test of the effect of agricultural factor marketization on agricultural non-point source pollution

	模型1 Model 1 (pol)	模型2 Model 2 (pol)	模型3 Model 3 (pol)	模型4 Model 4 (apol)	模型5 Model 5 (apol)
L.pol			1.185^***(4.05)		1.197^***(2.62)
L.apol				0.901^***(885.89)
agr	0.363^***(4.32)	4.294^**(2.15)	1.112^**(2.37)	0.378^***(4.61)	1.081^***(2.78)
agr²	−0.491^***(−4.65)	−5.683^*(−1.65)	−0.872^*(−1.76)	−0.334^***(−4.36)	−0.949^**(−2.00)
控制变量 Control variable	YES	YES	YES	YES	YES
N	510	510	450	450	390
R²	0.960	0.963
拉格朗日乘数检验 LM test		54.518^***
F		65.666
自回归滞后2阶检验 AR (2) tests			0.754	0.138	0.258
萨根检验 Sargan tests			0.312	0.281	0.020
汉森检验 Hansen tests			0.391	0.401	0.710
括号内表示对应Z值; 、、*分别表示在10%、5%和1%水平显著; pol和apol分别表示熵权法和均等赋值法测算的农业面源污染水平, L.pol、L.apol分别表示其对应的滞后项; agr和agr²分别表示农业要素市场化水平及其平方; N表示样本数。The corresponding Z value is in parentheses; , and * represent that the test is significance at levels of 10%, 5% and 1%, respectively; pol and apol represent the agricultural non-point source pollution measured by entropy weight and equalization assignment methods, respectively, and L.pol and L.apol are their corresponding lag terms; agr and agr² are agricultural factor marketization and their squared terms, respectively; N represent sample size.

下载: 导出CSV

表 3 农业要素市场化对面源污染传导机制的检验结果

Table 3. Test results of the marketization of agricultural factors on the transmission mechanism of agricultural non-point source pollution

	模型6 Model 6 (fer)	模型7 Model 7 (sca)	模型8 Model 8 (str)
L.fer	1.254^***(15.70)
L.sca		0.001^***(5.67)
L.str			0.952^**(2.16)
agr	1.038^**(2.44)	0.040(0.29)	3.410^***(2.63)
agr2	−1.226^**(−2.28)	0.425^***(3.62)	−4.646^***(−2.94)
控制变量 Control variable	Yes	Yes	Yes
N	450	450	450
自回归滞后2阶检验 AR (2) tests	0.083	0.010	0.034
萨根检验 Sargan test	0.619	0.405	0.849
汉森检验 Hansen tests	0.576	0.176	0.334
括号内表示对应Z值; L.fer、L.sca和L.str分别表示化学品投入强度、农业经营规模和种植结构的滞后项; agr和agr²分别表示农业要素市场化水平及其平方项; N表示样本数; ^、^和^*分别表示在10%、5%和1%水平显著。The corresponding Z value is in parentheses; fer, sca and str represent chemical input intensity, agricultural business scale, and planting structure, respectively, and L.fer, L.sca, and L.str are lagged terms of chemical input intensity, agricultural business scale, and planting structure, respectively; agr and agr² are agricultural factor marketization and their squared terms, respectively; N represents sample size; ^, ^ and ^* represent that the test is significance at levels of 10%, 5% and 1%, respectively.

下载: 导出CSV

表 4 环境规制对农业要素市场化影响机制的调节效应检验

Table 4. Test results of the moderating effect of environmental regulation on the mechanism of agricultural factor marketization influence

	模型9 Model 9 (pol)	模型10 Model 10 (pol)	模型11 Model 11 (pol)
L.pol	0.844^***(3.31)	1.365^***(8.30)	0.691^***(17.69)
agr	0.127^*(1.67)	0.940^***(2.58)	0.865^***(2.64)
agr²	−0.248^***(−2.74)	−0.919^**(−2.27)	−1.139^***(−2.70)
env	−0.023^**(−2.30)	0.078(0.29)	−0.051(−0.93)
fer	3.793^***(9.68)
fer×env	−0.033^***(−5.34)
sca		−0.004^**(−2.03)
sca×env		−0.001(−0.31)
str			0.360^*(1.90)
str×env			−0.078^**(−2.48)
控制变量　Control variable	Yes	Yes	Yes
N	450	450	450
自回归滞后2阶检验 AR (2) tests	0.468	0.359	0.449
萨根检验 Sargan tests	0.915	0.400	0.240
汉森检验 Hansen tests	0.999	0.759	0.362
括号内表示对应Z值; pol和L.pol分别表示熵权法测算的农业面源污染水平及其对应的滞后项; agr和agr²分别表示农业要素市场化水平及其平方项; env、fer、sca和str分别表示环境规制、化学品投入强度、农业经营规模和种植结构; fer×env、sca×env、str×env分别表示化学品投入强度、农业经营规模、种植结构与环境规制的交乘项; N表示样本数。The corresponding Z value is in parentheses; pol and L.pol represent the agricultural non-point source pollution measured by entropy weight and the corresponding lag term; agr and agr² are agricultural factor marketization and their squared terms, respectively; env, fer, sca and str represent environmental regulation, chemical input intensity, agricultural operation scale and planting structure, respectively; fer×env, sca×env and str×env respectively represent the cross term of chemical input intensity, agricultural operation scale, planting structure and environmental regulation, respectively; N represents sample size.

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(38)

[1]	郭韶伟, 唐成伟, 张昊. 农产品流通市场化与农业收入增长: 理论与实证[J]. 中国流通经济, 2011, 25(11): 107−112 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-8266.2011.11.026 GUO S W, TANG C W, ZHANG H. The level of agriculture product market and agricultural income growth: the theory and positive analysis[J]. China Business and Market, 2011, 25(11): 107−112 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-8266.2011.11.026
[2]	BABECKÝ J, CAMPOS N F. Does reform work? An econometric survey of the reform-growth puzzle[J]. Journal of Comparative Economics, 2011, 39(2): 140−158 doi: 10.1016/j.jce.2010.11.001
[3]	NIEHOF A. The significance of diversification for rural livelihood systems[J]. Food Policy, 2004, 29(4): 321−338 doi: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2004.07.009
[4]	王建华, 钭露露, 王缘. 环境规制政策情境下农业市场化对畜禽养殖废弃物资源化处理行为的影响分析[J]. 中国农村经济, 2022(1): 93−111 WANG J H, TOU L L, WANG Y. The impact of agricultural marketization on livestock waste resource utilization in the context of environmental regulation policy[J]. Chinese Rural Economy, 2022(1): 93−111
[5]	OUÉDRAOGO M, ZOUGMORÉ R, MOUSSA A S, et al. Markets and climate are driving rapid change in farming practices in Savannah West Africa[J]. Regional Environmental Change, 2017, 17(2): 437−449 doi: 10.1007/s10113-016-1029-9
[6]	COLMAN D. Ethics and externalities: agricultural stewardship and other behaviour: presidential address[J]. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1994, 45(3): 299−311 doi: 10.1111/j.1477-9552.1994.tb00405.x
[7]	BANDYOPADHYAY D, KING I, TANG X L. Human capital misallocation, redistributive policies, and TFP[J]. Journal of Macroeconomics, 2019, 60: 309−324 doi: 10.1016/j.jmacro.2019.02.005
[8]	孙会首, 黄贤金, 钟太洋, 等. 区域农业市场化发展对水土流失的影响−以江西省为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2004, 13(6): 573−578 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-8227.2004.06.012 SUN H S, HUANG X J, ZHONG T Y, et al. Farm-household’s behavior response and soil and water losses on regional agricultural market liberalization—a case study of Jiangxi Province[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2004, 13(6): 573−578 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-8227.2004.06.012
[9]	杨肃昌, 范国华. 农业要素市场化对农村生态环境质量的影响效应[J]. 华南农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2021, 20(4): 12−23 YANG S C, FAN G H. The effect of marketization of agricultural factors on the quality of rural eco-environment[J]. Journal of South China Agricultural University (Social Science Edition), 2021, 20(4): 12−23
[10]	杜雯翠, 张平淡, 朱松. 农业市场化、农业现代化与环境污染[J]. 北京理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2016, 18(1): 1−9 DU W C, ZHANG P D, ZHU S. Agricultural marketing, agricultural modernization and environmental pollution[J]. Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology (Social Sciences Edition), 2016, 18(1): 1−9
[11]	温铁军, 程存旺, 石嫣. 中国农业污染成因及转向路径选择[J]. 环境保护, 2013, 41(14): 47−51 doi: 10.14026/j.cnki.0253-9705.2013.14.001 WEN T J, CHENG C W, SHI Y. Causes of agricultural pollution in China and the choice of turning path[J]. Environmental Protection, 2013, 41(14): 47−51 doi: 10.14026/j.cnki.0253-9705.2013.14.001
[12]	温铁军. 资本过剩与农业污染[J]. 中国党政干部论坛, 2013(6): 64−67 WEN T J. Excess capital and agricultural pollution[J]. Chinese Cadres Tribune, 2013(6): 64−67
[13]	高珊, 黄贤金, 钟太洋, 等. 农业市场化对农户种植效益的影响−基于沪苏皖农户调查的实证研究[J]. 地理研究, 2013, 32(6): 1103−1112 GAO S, HUANG X J, ZHONG T Y, et al. Influence of agricultural marketization on farmers’ planting benefit: an empirical study of Shanghai, Jiangsu and Anhui[J]. Geographical Research, 2013, 32(6): 1103−1112
[14]	许经勇. 我国农业市场化改革的回顾与思考[J]. 财经问题研究, 2008(7): 19−23 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-176X.2008.07.004 XU J Y. Review and reflection on the reform of agricultural marketization in China[J]. Research on Financial and Economic Issues, 2008(7): 19−23 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-176X.2008.07.004
[15]	陈宗胜, 陈胜. 中国农业市场化进程测度[J]. 经济学家, 1999(3): 117−119 CHEN Z S, CHEN S. Measurement of agricultural marketization process in China[J]. Economist, 1999(3): 117−119
[16]	侯俊东, 吕军, 尹伟峰. 农户经营行为对农村生态环境影响研究[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2012, 22(3): 26−31 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2104.2012.03.005 HOU J D, LV J, YIN W F. Effects of farmer households’ production and operation behaviors on rural eco-environment[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2012, 22(3): 26−31 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2104.2012.03.005
[17]	张兴旺, 孟丽, 杜绍明, 等. 关于信息化影响农业市场化问题研究[J]. 农业经济问题, 2019, 40(4): 39−45 doi: 10.13246/j.cnki.iae.2019.04.005 ZHANG X W, MENG L, DU S M, et al. Research on informatization affecting agricultural marketization[J]. Issues in Agricultural Economy, 2019, 40(4): 39−45 doi: 10.13246/j.cnki.iae.2019.04.005
[18]	秦天, 彭珏, 邓宗兵, 等. 环境分权、环境规制对农业面源污染的影响[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2021, 31(2): 61−70 QIN T, PENG J, DENG Z B, et al. Environmental decentralization, environmental regulation and agricultural non-point source pollution[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2021, 31(2): 61−70
[19]	李谷成, 陈宁陆, 闵锐. 环境规制条件下中国农业全要素生产率增长与分解[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2011, 21(11): 153−160 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2104.2011.11.025 LI G C, CHEN N L, MIN R. Growth and sources of agricultural total factor productivity in China under environmental regulations[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2011, 21(11): 153−160 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2104.2011.11.025
[20]	解春艳, 黄传峰, 徐浩. 环境规制下中国农业技术效率的区域差异与影响因素−基于农业碳排放与农业面源污染双重约束的视角[J]. 科技管理研究, 2021, 41(15): 184−190 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7695.2021.15.024 XIE C Y, HUANG C F, XU H. Regional disparity and influencing factors of agricultural technology efficiency in China: based on dual constraint of agricultural carbon and agricultural non-point source pollution[J]. Science and Technology Management Research, 2021, 41(15): 184−190 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7695.2021.15.024
[21]	石华平, 易敏利. 环境规制、非农兼业与农业面源污染−以化肥施用为例[J]. 农村经济, 2020(7): 127−136 SHI H P, YI M L. Environmental regulation, non-agricultural concurrent work and agricultural non-point source pollution — taking fertilizer application as an example[J]. Rural Economy, 2020(7): 127−136
[22]	梁志会, 张露, 张俊飚. 土地要素市场化配置对农户化肥用量的影响[J]. 资源科学, 2022, 44(8): 1533−1544 doi: 10.18402/resci.2022.08.01 LIANG Z H, ZHANG L, ZHANG J B. Impact of the market-based allocation of farmland on farmers’ chemical fertilizer input[J]. Resources Science, 2022, 44(8): 1533−1544 doi: 10.18402/resci.2022.08.01
[23]	李克乐, 杨宏力. 劳动力转移、土地流转和溢出效应对农户种植结构的影响[J]. 湖南科技大学学报(社会科学版), 2021, 24(5): 77−89 doi: 10.13582/j.cnki.1672-7835.2021.05.010 LI K L, YANG H L. The impact of labor transfer, land transfer and spillover effects over the planting structure of farmers[J]. Journal of Hunan University of Science & Technology (Social Science Edition), 2021, 24(5): 77−89 doi: 10.13582/j.cnki.1672-7835.2021.05.010
[24]	张小蒂. 论市场化与环境保护的兼容性[J]. 管理世界, 2003(2): 138−143 doi: 10.19744/j.cnki.11-1235/f.2003.02.019 ZHANG X D. On the compatibility of marketization and environmental protection[J]. Management World, 2003(2): 138−143 doi: 10.19744/j.cnki.11-1235/f.2003.02.019
[25]	张建雷. 中国农业规模化转型的动力机制及内在困境−基于农民家庭发展的视角[J]. 开放时代, 2023(1): 189−204,9 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-2938.2023.01.019 ZHANG J L. The driving mechanism and internal difficulties of transformation to large-scale operation in Chinese agriculture: from the perspective of peasant family development[J]. Open Times, 2023(1): 189−204,9 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-2938.2023.01.019
[26]	王善高, 雷昊. 土地流转费用上涨对粮食生产的影响研究−基于种植结构调整、农作物品质调整和要素替代的视角[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2019, 40(7): 58−65 WANG S G, LEI H. The research on the impact of land transference costs rising on grain production—based on the adjustment of planting structure, adjustment of crops and substitution of production factors[J]. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 2019, 40(7): 58−65
[27]	薛选登, 谷秀云. 非粮化对粮食绿色全要素生产率的门槛效应研究[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2022, 43(7): 17−26 XUE X D, GU X Y. Research on the threshold effect of non-grain on grain green total factor productivity[J]. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 2022, 43(7): 17−26
[28]	丘雯文, 钟涨宝, 李兆亮, 等. 中国农业面源污染排放格局的时空特征[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2019, 40(1): 26−34 QIU W W, ZHONG Z B, LI Z L, et al. Spatial-temporal variations of agricultural non-point source pollution in China[J]. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 2019, 40(1): 26−34
[29]	胡浩, 杨泳冰. 要素替代视角下农户化肥施用研究−基于全国农村固定观察点农户数据[J]. 农业技术经济, 2015(3): 84−91 HU H, YANG Y B. Study on chemical fertilizer application of farmers from the rerspective of factor substitution — based on the data of farmers in fixed observation points in rural areas of China[J]. Journal of Agrotechnical Economics, 2015(3): 84−91
[30]	李博伟. 土地流转契约稳定性对转入土地农户化肥施用强度和环境效率的影响[J]. 自然资源学报, 2019, 34(11): 2317−2332 doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20191106 LI B W. The effect of the stability of land transfer contract on the fertilization intensity and environmental efficiency of the farmer who tranfers in land[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2019, 34(11): 2317−2332 doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20191106
[31]	揭昌亮, 王金龙, 庞一楠. 中国农业增长与化肥面源污染: 环境库兹涅茨曲线存在吗?[J]. 农村经济, 2018(11): 110−117 JIE C L, WANG J L, PANG Y N. Agricultural growth and non-point source pollution of chemical fertilizer in China: does the environmental kuznets curve exist?[J]. Rural Economy, 2018(11): 110−117
[32]	王宝义, 张卫国. 中国农业生态效率的省际差异和影响因素−基于1996—2015年31个省份的面板数据分析[J]. 中国农村经济, 2018(1): 46−62 WANG B Y, ZHANG W G. Cross-provincial differences in determinants of agricultural eco-efficiency in China: an analysis based on panel data from 31 provinces in 1996-2015[J]. Chinese Rural Economy, 2018(1): 46−62
[33]	姜松, 周洁, 邱爽. 适度规模经营是否能抑制农业面源污染−基于动态门槛面板模型的实证[J]. 农业技术经济, 2021(7): 33−48 doi: 10.13246/j.cnki.jae.2021.07.003 JIANG S, ZHOU J, QIU S. Can appropriate scale operation restrain agricultural non-point source pollution?—empirical study based on dynamic threshold panel model[J]. Journal of Agrotechnical Economics, 2021(7): 33−48 doi: 10.13246/j.cnki.jae.2021.07.003
[34]	戴晓春. 我国农业市场化的特征分析[J]. 中国农村经济, 2004(4): 58−62 DAI X C. Analysis on the characteristics of China’s agricultural marketization[J]. Chinese Rural Economy, 2004(4): 58−62
[35]	郭爱君, 张娜. 市场化改革影响绿色发展效率的理论机理与实证检验[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2020, 30(8): 118−127 GUO A J, ZHANG N. The effect of market-oriented reform on green development efficiency: a theoretical mechanism and empirical test[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2020, 30(8): 118−127
[36]	刘琼, 肖海峰. 农地经营规模与财政支农政策对农业碳排放的影响[J]. 资源科学, 2020, 42(6): 1063−1073 doi: 10.18402/resci.2020.06.05 LIU Q, XIAO H F. The impact of farmland management scale and fiscal policy for supporting agriculture on agricultural carbon emission[J]. Resources Science, 2020, 42(6): 1063−1073 doi: 10.18402/resci.2020.06.05
[37]	王一格, 王海燕, 郑永林, 等. 农业面源污染研究方法与控制技术研究进展[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2021, 42(1): 25−33 WANG Y G, WANG H Y, ZHENG Y L, et al. Advances in research methods and control technologies of agricultural non-point source pollution: a review[J]. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 2021, 42(1): 25−33
[38]	展进涛, 徐钰娇. 环境规制、农业绿色生产率与粮食安全[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2019, 29(3): 167−176 ZHAN J T, XU Y J. Environmental regulation, agricultural green TFP and grain security[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2019, 29(3): 167−176