李辛村, 张恩和, 董孔军, 何继红, 杨天育. 用AMMI双标图分析糜子品种的产量稳定性及试点代表性[J]. 中国生态农业学报(中英文), 2012, 20(4): 422-426. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1011.2012.00422
引用本文: 李辛村, 张恩和, 董孔军, 何继红, 杨天育. 用AMMI双标图分析糜子品种的产量稳定性及试点代表性[J]. 中国生态农业学报(中英文), 2012, 20(4): 422-426. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1011.2012.00422
AMMI-Biplot analysis of yield stability and test-site representativeness of proso-millet cultivars[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2012, 20(4): 422-426. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1011.2012.00422
Citation: AMMI-Biplot analysis of yield stability and test-site representativeness of proso-millet cultivars[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2012, 20(4): 422-426. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1011.2012.00422

用AMMI双标图分析糜子品种的产量稳定性及试点代表性

AMMI-Biplot analysis of yield stability and test-site representativeness of proso-millet cultivars

  • 摘要: 为准确评价基因型和环境互作效应对糜子品种产量稳定性及试点对品种分辨力的影响, 采用AMMI模型结合双标图和稳定性参数Dg(e)对第8轮(2006—2008年)国家糜子(粳性)品种区域试验的6个品种和9个试点的试验数据进行了分析。结果表明: 基因型效应、环境效应和基因型×环境交互效应(G×E)均达到极显著水平, 环境效应占总变异的52.85%, G×E交互效应占6.26% , 基因型效应占2.76%。交互效应中IPCA1、IPCA2、IPCA3解释了92.58%基因与环境互作信息。试验也表明不同糜子品种在各试点的稳定性及不同试点对糜子品种的分辨力差异较大。6个参试品种中, “榆糜3号”(CK)、“伊8414-1-2-1”属于高产稳产型品种; “甘9109-6-1-1-2”、“固01-391”产量较高, 但稳定性较差; “甘9133-1-3-4-1”稳产性好, 但产量较低; “固02-25”产量低且稳定性差。在9个试点中, 陕西府谷、宁夏同心、陕西榆林、内蒙赤峰4个试点对品种的分辨力较强, 宁夏固原、宁夏盐池、甘肃会宁、山西五寨、内蒙鄂尔多斯5个试点对品种的分辨力较弱。

     

    Abstract: The objective of this research was to study the stability of yield and test-site representativeness of proso-millet cultivars in China. Six cultivars were tested in nine sites in 10 m2 experimental plot under randomized completed block design and three replicates. The combination of double mark figure and special interaction Dg(e) of AMMI (additive main effects and multiplicative interaction) model was used to identify yield stability and test-site representativeness of the proso-millet cultivars. Analyzed data were from the national regional trials of proso-millet for 2006—2008. The results showed that the proportions of the sum of squares of genotype (G), environment (E) and G×E interactive effects on total sum of squares were 2.76%, 6.26% and 52.85%, respectively. There were significant effects in G action, E action and G×E interaction. IPCA1, IPCA2, IPCA3 accounted for up to 92.58% of the overall interaction effects. There were significant differences in stabilities of the six cultivars and representativeness of the nine test-sites. Among the six cultivars, “Yumi No.3” (CK) and “Yi8414-1-2-1” were high yield and better yield stability cultivars. “Gan9109-6-1-1-2” and “Gu01-391” exhibited less stability and high yield production. “Gan9133-1-3-4-1” showed to be a high-stability less-yield cultivar and “Gu02-25” was a low-yield unstable cultivar. For the nine test-sites, Fugu (Shaanxi Province), Tongxin (Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region), Yulin (Shaanxi Province) and Chifeng (Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region) had a better discrimination than Guyuan and Yanchi (Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region), Huining (Gansu Province), Wuzhai (Shanxi Province) and Eerduosi (Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region).

     

/

返回文章
返回