鄢玲艳, 孔令桥, 张路, 欧阳志云, 胡金明. 草地生态系统承载力概念、方法及关键问题[J]. 中国生态农业学报 (中英文), 2022, 30(8): 1228−1237. DOI: 10.12357/cjea.20210905
引用本文: 鄢玲艳, 孔令桥, 张路, 欧阳志云, 胡金明. 草地生态系统承载力概念、方法及关键问题[J]. 中国生态农业学报 (中英文), 2022, 30(8): 1228−1237. DOI: 10.12357/cjea.20210905
YAN L Y, KONG L Q, ZHAGN L, OUYANG Z Y, HU J M. The definition, methods and key issues of grassland ecosystem carrying capacity[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2022, 30(8): 1228−1237. DOI: 10.12357/cjea.20210905
Citation: YAN L Y, KONG L Q, ZHAGN L, OUYANG Z Y, HU J M. The definition, methods and key issues of grassland ecosystem carrying capacity[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2022, 30(8): 1228−1237. DOI: 10.12357/cjea.20210905

草地生态系统承载力概念、方法及关键问题

The definition, methods and key issues of grassland ecosystem carrying capacity

  • 摘要: 草地是中国面积最大的陆地生态系统, 具有重要的生态功能, 是牧民赖以生存和发展的物质基础。同时草地生态系统脆弱敏感, 退化严重, 对生态安全和经济发展造成威胁。草地生态系统承载力的研究对实现草畜平衡和草地可持续利用、维护我国生态脆弱区生态安全具有重要意义。本文对草地生态系统承载力相关概念及发展进行了梳理, 提出了草地生态系统承载力评估概念框架。在总结现有草地生态系统承载力评估方法基础上, 重点分析了目前草地生态系统承载力研究方法以及量化模型的不足, 提出了未来需要进一步加强研究的领域和方向。在草地生态系统承载力评估方法上, 当前主要采用载畜量进行量化, 现有方法大多根据牧草生产力及农副产品价格、牧草产量、草地净初级生产力或植被指数估算, 现存问题主要有: 1)产草量受多因素影响, 不同研究区间差异较大, 数据难以准确获取或估算; 2)忽略了野生动物、病虫害导致的牧草损失量; 3)实际载畜量折算未考虑牲畜体重、年龄大小; 4)缺乏较完备的多因素整合模型与预测预警模型。未来应在以下方面深入研究: 1)构建完善的草地生态系统承载力研究基础理论体系; 2)完善草地生态系统承载力评价指标体系, 优化评价模型; 3)加强参数的动态监测和标准化; 4)建立草地生态系统承载力研究预测预警机制, 科学确定草地生态系统承载阈值。

     

    Abstract: Grassland is the largest terrestrial ecosystem in China, and its important function is the material basis for the survival and development of herders. Simultaneously, the grassland ecosystem is fragile and sensitive, with serious degradation problems, posing a threat to ecological security and economic development. The study of the carrying capacity of grassland ecosystems is of great value to achieve the balance of grass-livestock, the sustainable use of grassland, and maintenance of ecological security in ecologically fragile areas in China. This paper combs through concepts related to the carrying capacity of grassland ecosystems, and proposes a conceptual framework for assessing the carrying capacity of grassland ecosystems. Based on the summary of the existing assessment methods of grassland ecosystem carrying capacity, this paper focuses on the research methods and quantitative models involved in the current carrying capacity of grassland ecosystems and finally analyzes the fields and directions that need to be strengthened in the future for the carrying capacity of grassland ecosystems. At present, methods for assessing grassland ecosystem carrying capacity mainly involve quantification using the livestock carrying capacity. Most of the existing methods incorporate estimations based on forage productivity, agricultural and sideline product prices, pasture yield, and net primary productivity, or normalized difference vegetation index. The existing problems are mainly: 1) grass yield is affected by multiple factors, in different study areas it varies greatly, and data is difficult to obtain or estimate accurately; 2) the amount of forage loss caused by wildlife, pests, and diseases is ignored; 3) stocking rate is converted without considering the weight and age of the livestock; and 4) there exists a lack of a multifactorial integration model and predictive and early warning model. Future research should be lucubrated as follows: 1) build a perfect basic theoretical system for grassland ecosystem carrying capacity research; 2) improve the evaluation index system of grassland ecosystem carrying capacity and optimize the evaluation model; 3) strengthen dynamic monitoring and standardization of parameters; and 4) establish prediction and early warning mechanisms, and scientifically determine the carrying threshold of grassland ecosystems.

     

/

返回文章
返回