上海种养结合型生态农场碳足迹及氮素流动分析
Carbon footprint and nitrogen flow in integrated crop-livestock ecological farms in shanghai
-
摘要: 种养结合型生态农场通过将种植业和养殖业有机结合, 实现了农业废弃物资源的高效利用和环境的绿色发展, 是我国可持续农业模式的典范。本研究通过对比上海多元种养循环型(MCLS)、种养循环型(CLS)、有机水稻种植型(OR)3种生态农场和常规水稻种植型(CK)农场, 采用生命周期评价结合物质流分析方法, 对比了不同类型农场的碳足迹及其氮循环利用效率, 并针对农场的碳排放现状, 以养殖业规模为基础, 通过设置不同有机肥替代比例(有机肥全替代及30%替代)来优化农场的碳排放情况。结果表明, 不同类型农场总碳排量为CLS>MCLS>OR>CK, 分别为3 508.24、1 736.47、232.60和104.21 t CO2;单位面积碳排放量为MCLS>CLS>OR>CK, 分别为76.69、50.29、21.04和13.63 t(CO2)·hm−2, 单位产值的碳足迹为CLS>OR>CK>MCLS, 分别为4.14、3.79、3.11和2.10 t(CO2)·万元−1。单位营养密度的碳足迹为CLS>OR>MCLS>CK, 分别为1.04、0.98、0.47、0.44 kg(CO2)·NDU−1。单位面积碳固定量为MCLS>CLS>OR>CK, 分别为11.58、9.08、8.57和6.47 t(CO2)·hm−2。对比种植型农场, 种养结合农场同时提高了农场的碳排放量和碳固定量。在种养结合型农场中, 能源和养殖过程的直接排放为主要的排放源, 两者占比可达75%以上; 种植型农场中物资投入占总碳排放量的40.61%~50.78%。除OR外, 其余农场普遍存在氮肥过量投入的情况, 因此养分利用效率仅有30%左右, 种养结合模式能将农场的氮素利用效率提高至50%左右。在肥料减量及30%有机肥替代情景下, 各农场碳排强度减少约30%, 通过调整其施肥措施及能源等方式, 生态农场有进一步减排的潜力。Abstract: Ecological farms adopt environmentally friendly agricultural techniques such as green manure, straw returning to the field, integrated farming and breeding, and organic fertilizer substitution. These technologies can reduce fertilizer application and decrease non-point source pollution, but there is limited research on their impact on carbon footprint and nutrient utilization. Measuring the ecological benefits of ecological farms is crucial for promoting the application of composite ecological technology models. Therefore, this study focuses on ecological farms in Shanghai, using a combination of life cycle assessment and material flow analysis methods to compare the carbon footprints and nitrogen cycling efficiency of different types of ecological farms. Based on the scale of livestock farming, different proportions of organic fertilizer substitution (full substitution and 30% substitution) are set up to optimize farm carbon emissions. The results show that compared with plantation farms, integrated crop-livestock ecological farms simultaneously increase both carbon emissions and carbon sequestration, with higher carbon footprints per unit area. In integrated crop-livestock ecological farms, emissions from energy use and livestock farming processes account for more than 75% of total emissions. Among these, MCLS has the highest carbon sequestration per unit area 11.58 t(CO2)·hm−2 and the lowest carbon emissions per unit output 2.10 t(CO2)·(104¥)−1, but its carbon emission intensity 76.70 t(CO2)·hm−2 is the highest due to the scale of livestock farming and input of energy and materials. integrated crop-livestock ecological farms do not exhibit clear advantages in terms of carbon footprints per unit nutrient density and yield. Except for OR, other farms generally have excessive nitrogen fertilizer input, resulting in only about 30% nutrient utilization efficiency for the cultivation part of integrated farming and breeding farms and conventional farms, forming a high-input, low-output production model. However, integrated live-stock mode can improve nitrogen utilization efficiency to around 50% through waste resource recycling, indicating that integrated live-stock ecological farms can make more efficient use of resources invested. Under scenarios of fertilizer reduction and 30% organic fertilizer substitution for chemical fertilizers, the carbon emission intensity of all farms decreases by about 30%, suggesting that integrated farming and breeding ecological farms have great potential for emission reduction.