农业新质生产力对水稻产量的影响及其门槛和空间溢出效应

Impact of new quality productive force in agriculture on rice yield and its threshold and spatial spillover effect

  • 摘要: 作为我国农业发展的新目标和新要求, 农业新质生产力的发展对水稻产量的影响直接关系国家粮食安全。基于2012—2023年省级面板数据, 利用固定效应模型、中介效应模型、门槛模型与空间计量模型, 本研究系统探究了农业新质生产力对水稻总产量的影响及其作用机制。结果发现, 农业新质生产力发展对水稻总产量有负向影响, 其原因是农业新质生产力对水稻种植面积的负效应远大于对单产的增产效应。但是, 农业新质生产力对水稻产量的影响具有明显的门槛效应。当水稻种植面积达到一定规模时, 农业新质生产力对水稻产量的影响会从负效应转为正效应。异质性分析发现, 农业新质生产力显著降低了中部地区的水稻总产量, 但显著增加了西部地区水稻总产量; 同时显著提升了水稻主产区水稻总产量, 降低了非主产区水稻总产量。另外, 农业新质生产力对水稻总产量的负影响还具有空间溢出效应, 即农业新质生产力不仅会降低本地区的水稻总产量, 还会对周边地区的水稻总产量产生负面影响。因此, 在发展农业新质生产力的同时, 为确保实现水稻产量同步提升, 要全力保障水稻种植面积, 优化水稻区域发展布局, 提高水稻生产规模化水平。

     

    Abstract: As a new goal and requirement for China’s agricultural development, the development of new quality productive force in agriculture has profound implications for rice yield, which is intrinsically linked to national food security. Although the existing research primarily explores the relationship between the development of new quality productive force in agriculture and grain production from a theoretical standpoint, this study systematically investigated the influence of new quality productive force in agriculture on total rice yield and the underlying mechanisms from both theoretical and empirical perspectives. It also considered the heterogeneous effects of new quality productive force in agriculture across different rice production scales and geographical regions. Based on provincial panel data from 2012 to 2023, a comprehensive evaluation index system for new quality productive force in agriculture was established in three key dimensions: agricultural laborers, subjects of labor, and labor means. This study employed the fixed effects, mediating effects, threshold, and spatial econometric models to rigorously test the proposed relationships. Our empirical findings provided several critical insights. First, new quality productive force in agriculture had a significantly negative impact on total rice yield. This result remained robust after accounting for potential endogeneity and conducting a series of robustness tests, including extreme value winsorization, an alternative dimensionality reduction method for indices of new quality productive force in agriculture, and the exclusion of selected subsamples. Second, the mechanism analysis showed that new quality productive force in agriculture had an adverse effect on the rice cultivation area, although it increased the yield per unit area. The magnitude of this area-reducing effect substantially outweighed the productivity gain per unit, leading to an overall decrease in the total rice yield. Third, the threshold regression results indicated that the relationships between new quality productive force in agriculture and both total rice yield and yield per unit were nonlinear and contingent on the scale of the rice-planting area. Specifically, when the rice planting area exceeded the threshold values of 3.3810 and 2.8214 (in standardized units), the effects of new quality productive force in agriculture on total rice yield and per unit yield shifted from negative to positive, respectively. In addition, the regional heterogeneity analysis highlighted distinct spatial patterns. New quality productive force in agriculture significantly reduced the total rice yield in central China, whereas it significantly increased the total rice yield in the western region. Similarly, it significantly boosted the total rice yield in major rice-producing zones, whereas it had the opposite effect in non-major rice-producing zones. Finally, the negative influence of new quality productive force in agriculture on total rice yield exhibited spatial spillover effects, which indicated that it not only reduced the total rice yield in the local region but also negatively affected the yield in neighboring areas. In light of these findings, new quality productive force in agriculture may conflict with the goal of total yield stabilization in key staple crops such as rice. Therefore, to harmonize the advancements of new quality productive force in agriculture with total rice yield assurance, it is imperative to implement integrated measures that fully safeguard rice cultivation areas, optimize the regional development layout, and improve the scale of rice production.

     

/

返回文章
返回