有机水溶肥料通过激发土著微生物活化周转土壤磷能力促进棉花生长和磷吸收

Organic water-soluble fertilizers promote cotton growth and phosphorus uptake by stimulating indigenous microbiota-mediated soil phosphorus activation

  • 摘要: 为揭示6类常见有机水溶肥料激发土著微生物介导的土壤磷活化利用、促进作物磷吸收和生长的共性机理与浓度效应, 以轻度盐渍土-棉花盆栽为试验体系, 设置有机水溶肥料类型(即海藻精粉剂、海藻精水剂、聚谷氨酸、甲壳素、鱼蛋白和糖蜜为代表的6种有机水溶肥料)与有机碳施用量梯度(0、厂家推荐用量、40、80、160和240 mg·pot−1)两个因素, 分析了同一类型有机水溶肥料在不同有机碳施用量条件下和不同类型有机水溶肥料在相同有机碳施用量条件下对棉花幼苗生长(株高、叶面积、生物量和吸磷量)、土壤微生物活性(土壤微生物生物量磷含量和土壤碱性磷酸酶活性)以及土壤有效磷含量的影响, 并比较了6种有机水溶肥料的碳激发效应(即单位质量有机碳施用量引起的微生物生物量磷含量、碱性磷酸酶活性、生物有效性磷以及植株吸磷量的变化值)。结果表明: 6种有机水溶肥料激发土壤磷活化利用、增强棉花幼苗磷吸收和改善棉花幼苗生长的效应与有机碳施用量水平相关, 其定量关系可以用线性加平台模型拟合。不同类型有机水溶肥料对棉花幼苗生长的激发效应存在有机碳施用量的临界阈值, 尽管不同类型有机水溶肥料的有机碳施用量阈值存在一定差别, 但绝大部分处于30~60 mg·pot−1范围内。相同有机碳施用量条件下, 不同类型有机水溶肥料对棉花幼苗的促生效应无显著差异, 但有机碳施用量对土壤微生物生物量磷含量、碱性磷酸酶活性及生物有效性磷的激发效应存在显著差异, 表明土施有机水溶肥料对植物生长的促进效应并非通过直接刺激产生, 而是通过激发土壤微生物介导的土壤磷活化利用间接实现。土壤微生物对不同类型有机水溶肥料碳源的利用能力不同, 糖蜜类有机水溶肥料对微生物生物量磷的激发效应高于其他5类。同时, 本文还对现行有机水溶肥料的定义进行了探讨, 提出有机水溶肥料的“肥料”作用是通过水溶性有机碳激发土著微生物活化周转土壤磷的活性与功能实现的。

     

    Abstract: To elucidate the common mechanisms and concentration effects of six typical organic water-soluble fertilizers (OWSFs) on soil phosphorus (P) activation mediated by indigenous microorganisms, crop P uptake, and growth enhancement, a pot experiment was conducted using cotton in slightly saline soil. This study investigated two factors: 1) OWSF types (six representatives: alginic acid powder, alginic acid aqueous solution, polyglutamic acid, chitin, fish protein, and molasses fertilizers), and 2) organic carbon application rates (0, manufacturer-recommended dose, 40, 80, 160, and 240 mg·pot−1). The effects of organic carbon application rates within individual and across different OWSF types at the same organic carbon application rate were evaluated on cotton seedling growth (plant height, leaf area, biomass, and P uptake), soil microbial activity (microbial biomass P and phosphatase activity), and soil available P content. The carbon priming effect (changes in microbial biomass P, phosphatase activity, bioavailable P, and plant P uptake per unit carbon input) of the six OWSFs was quantified. The key findings showed that 1) all six OWSFs enhanced soil P activation, cotton P uptake, and seedling growth in a carbon-dose-dependent manner, with dose-response relationships well fitted by linear-plateau models. The priming effects of different OWSF types on cotton seedling growth were associated with critical thresholds of organic carbon application rate. Although the organic carbon application rate thresholds varied among different OWSF types, the majority of the thresholds fell within the range of 30–60 mg·pot−1. 2) At same organic carbon application rates, OWSF types showed no significant differences in promoting cotton growth but exhibited distinct priming effects on microbial biomass P, phosphatase activity, and bioavailable P (P<0.05). This indicated that OWSFs indirectly enhanced plant growth by stimulating microbially mediated soil P activation rather than through direct effects. 3) The efficiency of the priming effect of the six OWSF-carbon sources varied significantly, with the molasses-based OWSF demonstrating the highest priming effect on microbial biomass P among the six types. We further discussed the current definition of OWSFs, proposing that their “fertilizer” function was primarily achieved through water-soluble organic carbon priming microbial activity to activate soil P turnover.

     

/

返回文章
返回