黄河源区生态系统服务时空变化及权衡协同关系

Spatial-temporal change and trade-off and synergistic relationship of ecosystem services in the source region of the Yellow River

  • 摘要: 黄河源区是我国典型的高寒生态脆弱区, 研究其生态系统服务特征及不同服务功能间的权衡协同关系对于区域环境安全和可持续发展具有重要意义。本文采用InVEST模型, 量化了2000—2020年黄河源区产水量、土壤保持、碳储量和生境质量4项生态系统服务, 利用Spearman相关系数分析生态系统服务间的关系, 采用Getis-Ord Gi*统计指数识别生态系统服务冷、热点, 利用GeoDA软件二元局部空间自相关分析, 对生态系统服务权衡与协同作用进行空间化表达。结果表明: 1) 2000—2020年, 黄河源区产水量和土壤保持呈“先增加后减少再增加”的波动趋势, 碳储量和生境质量呈现微弱降低趋势; 在空间上, 产水量和土壤保持呈“东南高、西北低”的分布格局, 碳储量和生境质量高值区集中在研究区中部。2)黄河源区生态系统服务热点区域主要分布在林地和草地占比较高的中部地区, 冷点区域主要分布在扎陵湖、鄂陵湖以上的源头区域和研究区中北部。3)产水量和生境质量呈权衡关系, 产水量和碳储量由权衡关系转为协同关系, 产水量和土壤保持、碳储量和土壤保持、碳储量和生境质量以及土壤保持和生境质量间均呈协同关系。4)在空间格局上, 高-高集聚(协同)主要分布在研究区中部, 低-低集聚(协同)主要分布在研究区西部和北部地区, 低-高集聚(权衡)和高-低集聚(权衡)分散在研究区的西南部和中北部。研究结果可为黄河源区生态系统服务空间格局优化和生态文明建设提供参考依据。

     

    Abstract: The source region of the Yellow River is a typical alpine and ecologically fragile region in China. Studying spatiotemporal changes in ecosystem services and their trade-off and synergistic relationship is imperative for ecological security and sustainable development in this region. In this study, the InVEST model was used to quantify four ecosystem services (i.e. water yield, soil conservation, carbon storage, and habitat quality) in the source region of the Yellow River from 2000 to 2020. The Spearman correlation coefficient method was used to analyze the relationship between ecosystem services, and the Getis-Ord Gi* statistical index was used to identify the cold/hot spots of ecosystem services. The trade-offs and synergies of ecosystem services were spatially expressed using the GeoDA software for binary local spatial autocorrelation analysis. The results were as follows. 1) From 2000 to 2020, water yield and soil conservation in the source region of the Yellow River showed a fluctuating trend of “increasing, then decreasing, and then increasing,” while the overall trend was an upward trend with increases of 139.0 mm and 43.20 t·hm−2, respectively. Carbon storage and habitat quality decreased slightly by 0.4% and 1.9%, respectively. Spatially, water yield and soil conservation exhibited a distribution pattern of “higher in southeast and lower in northwest”. Areas with high carbon storage and habitat quality were predominantly located in the central part of the study area. 2) The hot spots of ecosystem services in the source region of the Yellow River were mainly distributed in the middle of the study area, where forestland and grassland accounted for a high proportion of the land cover. The cold spots were mainly distributed in the source area above Zhaling Lake and Eling Lake, and in the middle northern part of the study area. 3) There was a trade-off relationship between water yield and habitat quality, and the weak trade-off relationship between water yield and carbon storage became a weak synergistic relationship in 2020. There were synergistic relationships between water yield and soil conservation, carbon storage and soil conservation, carbon storage and habitat quality, and soil conservation and habitat quality. Trade-offs between ecosystem services were weakened, and most synergistic relationships were enhanced. 4) In terms of spatial pattern, there was significant spatial heterogeneity of ecosystem service trade-offs and synergies. High-high agglomeration (synergies) were mainly distributed in the central part of the study area, whereas low-low agglomeration (synergies) were mainly located in the western and northern regions. Low-high and high-low agglomeration (trade-offs) were mainly dispersed in the middle northern regions, as well as in the southwestern part of the study area. The results are expected to guide the optimization of ecosystem service spatial patterns and the construction of ecological civilization in the source region of the Yellow River.

     

/

返回文章
返回