耕作与秸秆还田方式下土壤碳氮储量取决于土壤团聚体碳氮含量及其稳定性*

  • 摘要: 基于耕作措施及秸秆还田对玉米田土壤团聚体和土壤碳氮储量的影响分析, 解析土壤团聚体碳氮含量与土壤碳氮储量之间的关系, 旨在为干旱绿洲灌区农田土壤碳氮固持技术研发提供理论依据。于2015—2018进行田间试验, 设置传统翻耕+秸秆不还田(T)、传统翻耕+秸秆还田(TS)、免耕+秸秆不还田(NT)、免耕+秸秆还田(NTS)四个处理。研究结果表明:同一秸秆处理下, 免耕有机碳储量(SOCs)和全氮储量(NTs)较传统翻耕提高了3.1%~4.5%和9.3%~11.9%, 同一耕作处理下, 秸秆还田较秸秆不还田处理提高了5.3%~7.6%和9.1%~11.8%;与T相比, 免耕秸秆还田显著提高了SOCs和NTs, 其中以NTS处理储量最高, 达14.65~14.98Mgha-1和1.44~1.46Mgha-1。研究还发现, 有机碳、全氮含量在各粒径团聚体分布呈(<0.25 mm)>(0.25-1 mm)>(1-2 mm)>(>2mm), >0.25 mm大团聚体对土壤有机碳、全氮的贡献最大, 且随土层深度而降低, NTS较T提高了15.2%~23.5%、25.3%~42.1%。免耕秸秆还田提高SOCs和NTs还主要是因为增加了0.25-1 mm大团聚体含量, 进而提高土壤团聚体平均重量直径(MWD)与几何平均直径(GMD), 降低了分形维数(FD), 增加了团聚体的稳定性。通过构建结构方程模型表明, >0.25 mm大团聚体稳定性与碳氮储量呈显著正相关, 土壤碳氮储量的增加取决于土壤团聚体中碳氮含量的提高。免耕与秸秆还田均有利于提高土壤团粒稳定性, 增加农田土壤碳氮储量, 在不同组合处理中NTS处理对耕层土壤改良效果最佳, 且土壤碳氮储量的增加取决于土壤团聚体中碳氮含量的提高。

     

    Abstract: Based on the analysis of the effects of tillage measures and straw returning on soil aggregate and soil carbon and nitrogen storage in maize field, the relationship between soil aggregate carbon and nitrogen content and soil carbon and nitrogen storage was analyzed, aiming to provide theoretical basis for the research and development of soil carbon and nitrogen retention technology in farmland in arid oasis irrigation area. Field experiments were conducted from 2015 to 2018, and four treatments were set up: traditional tillage + no-straw returning (T), traditional tillage + straw returning (TS), no-tillage + no-straw returning (NT) and no-tillage + straw returning (NTS). The results showed that the organic carbon storage (SOCs) and total nitrogen storage (NTs) of no-tillage were increased by 3.1%-4.5% and 9.3%-11.9% compared with traditional tillage under the same straw treatment, and the organic carbon storage (SOCs) and total nitrogen storage (NTs) under the same tillage treatment were increased by 5.3%-7.6% and 9.1%-11.8% compared with non-tillage treatment. Compared with T, SOCs and NTs were significantly increased under no-tillage straw returning, among which the reserves under NTS treatment were the highest, reaching 14.65-14.98Mgha-1 and 1.44-1.46Mgha-1 . It was also found that the contents of organic carbon and total nitrogen were distributed in the order of (< 0.25mm) > (0.25-1 mm) > (1-2 mm) > (>2mm), and the contribution of large aggregates > 0.25mm to soil organic carbon and total nitrogen was the largest, and decreased with the depth of soil layer. Compared with T, NTS increased by 15.2%-23.5% and 25.3%-42.1%. No-tillage straw returning increased SOCs and NTs mainly because the content of large aggregates was increased by 0.25-1 mm, and the mean weight diameter (MWD) and geometric mean diameter (GMD) of soil aggregates were increased, the fractal dimension (FD) was decreased, and the stability of aggregates was increased. The structural equation model showed that the stability of large aggregates >0.25mm was significantly positively correlated with carbon and nitrogen storage, and the increase of soil carbon and nitrogen storage depended on the increase of carbon and nitrogen content in soil aggregates. Both no-tillage and straw returning were beneficial to improving soil aggregate stability and increasing soil carbon and nitrogen storage in farmland. Among different combined treatments, NTS treatment had the best effect on soil improvement, and the increase of soil carbon and nitrogen storage depended on the increase of carbon and nitrogen content in soil aggregates.

     

/

返回文章
返回