不同耕作与秸秆还田方式对土壤团聚体及碳氮储量的影响

Effects of different tillage practices and straw returning methods on soil aggregates and carbon–nitrogen storage

  • 摘要: 针对河西绿洲灌区土壤碳氮储量低、土壤质量持续下降等问题, 基于耕作措施及秸秆还田对玉米田土壤团聚体和土壤碳氮储量的影响分析, 设置传统翻耕+秸秆不还田(CT)、传统翻耕+秸秆还田(TS)、免耕+秸秆不还田(NT)、免耕+秸秆还田(NTS) 4个处理, 解析土壤团聚体碳氮含量与土壤碳氮储量之间的关系。研究结果表明: 耕作措施、秸秆还田及两者互作对0~30 cm土层有机碳储量(SOCs)和全氮储量(TNs)影响显著(P<0.05)。与CT相比, 免耕秸秆还田显著提高了SOCs和TNs含量(P<0.05), 其中以NTS处理储量最高, 达14.65~15.00 Mg(C)∙hm−2和1.44~1.46 Mg(N)∙hm−2。同一秸秆处理下, 免耕较传统翻耕使SOCs和TNs含量显著提高5.3%~7.6%和9.2%~11.8% (P<0.05); 同一耕作处理下, 秸秆还田较秸秆不还田处理显著提高3.6%~3.7%和4.6%~5.9% (P<0.05)。≥0.25 mm大团聚体对土壤有机碳、全氮的贡献最大, 且随土层深度增加而降低, 其贡献率NTS较CT显著提高18.6%~28.5%、20.6%~27.9% (P<0.05)。免耕秸秆还田提高SOCs和TNs含量主要是因为提高了0.25~1 mm大团聚体含量, 进而提高土壤团聚体平均重量直径(MWD)与几何平均直径(GMD), 降低了分形维数(FD), 增加了团聚体的稳定性。结构方程模型结果表明, ≥0.25 mm大团聚体稳定性与碳氮储量呈显著正相关, 土壤碳氮储量的增加取决于土壤团聚体中碳氮含量的提高。因此, 免耕与秸秆还田均有利于提高土壤团聚体的稳定性, 增加农田土壤碳氮储量, 在不同组合处理中NTS处理对耕层土壤改良效果最佳, 且土壤碳氮储量的增加取决于土壤团聚体中碳氮含量的提高。

     

    Abstract: In this study, to address issues such as the low soil carbon and nitrogen reserves and continuous decline in soil quality in the Hexi Oasis irrigation area, we assessed the effects of tillage practices and the incorporation of straw on soil aggregates and carbon–nitrogen reserves in cornfields. To this end, we established the following four treatments: traditional tillage + no straw return (CT), traditional tillage + straw return (TS), no-till + no straw return (NT), and no-till + straw return (NTS). The results indicated that tillage practices, straw return, and their interaction had significant effects on soil organic carbon (SOC) and total nitrogen (TN) reserves in the 0–30 cm soil layer (P < 0.05). Compared with conventional tillage (CT), no-till with straw incorporation significantly increased the contents of SOC and TN (P < 0.05), with the NTS treatment contributing to the highest reserves at 14.65–15.00 Mg(C)∙hm−2 and 1.44-1.46 Mg(N)∙hm−2, respectively. Under the same straw treatment, compared with conventional tillage, the no-till treatment contributed to significant increases in the contents of SOC and TN of 5.3%–7.6% and 9.2%–11.8%, respectively (P < 0.05). Under the same tillage treatment, the incorporation of straw resulted in significant increases of 3.6%–3.7% and 4.6%–5.9% in SOC and TN, respectively (P < 0.05) compared with non-incorporation. Macroaggregates of ≥0.25 mm in size were found to contribute most to the SOC and TN contents in soil, with their contribution declining with increasing soil depth. Compared with that of CT, their contribution under the NTS treatment was significantly higher by 18.6%–28.5% and 20.6%–27.9%, respectively (P < 0.05). No-till straw incorporation was found to promote increases in SOC and TN primarily by enhancing the contents of 0.25–1 mm macroaggregates, thereby increasing the mean weight diameter and geometric mean diameter of the soil aggregates, reducing the fractal dimension, and improving aggregate stability. The results of structural equation modeling indicated that the stability of ≥0.25 mm large aggregates was significantly positively correlated with the storage of carbon and nitrogen, increases in which are dependent on the enhancement of carbon and nitrogen content within soil aggregates. Consequently, both no-till farming and straw incorporation contribute favorably to enhancing soil aggregate stability and promote increases in carbon and nitrogen storage in farmland soils. Among the different combination treatments assessed, the NTS treatment was established to have the best soil improvement effects in the plow layer, and we found that increases in soil carbon and nitrogen storage are dependent on enhancement of the carbon and nitrogen contents within soil aggregates.

     

/

返回文章
返回