液态粪污施用过程氨气与温室气体排放特征及驱动因素研究

Research on the characteristics and driving factors of ammonia and greenhouse gas emissions during the application of livestock slurry

  • 摘要: 随着我国畜禽养殖业规模化发展,液态粪污资源化利用成为农业绿色转型的关键环节,然而,其还田过程常因施用方式不当,造成严重的氨气挥发(NH3)和温室气体(N2O、CH4)排放,制约行业绿色可持续发展。现有研究因样本量有限、区域背景差异等原因,往往难以全面解析气体排放的复杂机制,导致研究结论普适性不足。因此,本研究旨在通过整合和再分析不同类型液态粪污施用过程气体排放相关数据,以明确其排放特征及驱动因素。基于1989-2025年全球103篇文献的1057条试验数据,采用Meta分析并结合SHAP值模型,系统量化粪污特性、自然因素及施用管理对NH3、N2O和CH4排放因子的影响。结果表明,液态粪污类型对N2O排放影响显著,其中干湿分离粪水N2O排放因子最高(2.4%),干湿分离沼液最低(0.5%);NH3和CH4排放因子在整体粪污类型间无显著差异,但牛场粪污(如干湿分离沼液NH3排放因子达34.7%)对NH3和N2O排放影响更显著,而猪场粪污(如干湿分离粪水CH4排放因子为5.1%)则对CH4排放影响更显著;NH3与N2O在施用过程中的排放存在拮抗效应,带状施用为兼顾氨气减排与减少氧化亚氮和甲烷排放的优先技术选择。本研究为液态粪污高效还田及制定减排策略提供了科学依据,助力农业绿色低碳发展。

     

    Abstract: With the large-scale development of China's livestock and poultry breeding industry, the resource utilization of slurry has become a key link in the green transformation of agriculture. However, due to the lack of reasonable application methods during its return to the field, it is often accompanied by serious problems of ammonia volatilization (NH3) and greenhouse gas emissions (N2O, CH4), which restrict the green and sustainable development of the industry. Due to limited sample size and regional background differences, existing studies often find it difficult to comprehensively analyze the complex mechanisms of gas emissions, resulting in insufficient generalizability of research conclusions. Therefore, this study aims to clarify the emission characteristics and driving factors of different types of livestock slurry application processes by integrating and reanalyzing gas emission related data. Based on 1057 experimental data from 103 global literature from 1989 to 2025, a meta-analysis was conducted using the SHAP value model to systematically quantify the effects of manure characteristics, natural factors, and application management on NH3, N2O, and CH4 emission factors. The results showed that the type of slurry had a significant impact on N2O emission factors, with the highest concentration of dry wet separated manure water (2.4%) and the lowest concentration of dry wet separated biogas slurry (0.5%); There is no significant difference in the emission factors of NH3 and CH4 among the overall types of slurry, but there are differences among different livestock and poultry. The main manifestation is that cattle slurry (such as dry wet separation biogas slurry NH3 emission factor of 34.7%) has a more significant impact on NH3 and N2O emissions, while pig slurry has a more significant impact on CH4 emissions (dry wet separation manure water CH4 emission factor of 5.1%); By exploring the key driving factors of gas emissions during the application of slurry, it was found that the emission factors of NH3, N2O, and CH4 emissions are dominated by different factors and have antagonistic effects, especially in terms of application management. The main manifestation is that the application method and nitrogen application rate have a positive effect on NH3 emissions, while having a negative effect on N2O and CH4; From the response results of various gas emission factors to the characteristics of slurry, natural factors, and application management, it can also be seen that different factors, especially slurry characteristics and application management, have opposite effects on the emissions of NH3 and N2O. In terms of slurry characteristics, the NH3 emission factor shows a trend of first increasing and then decreasing with changes in various indicators, while N2O emission shows the opposite trend. In terms of application methods, compared to surface application (37.5%) and band spreading (17.7%), surface incorporation (10%) and injection application (13.8%) can significantly reduce NH3 emission factors, but at the same time significantly increase N2O emissions. By sorting and analyzing the gas data under the coupling conditions of slurry type and application method, a collaborative emission reduction strategy is proposed: When applying livestock slurry-urine mixtures, dry-wet separated manure water, and biogas slurry, the band spreading method exhibits significant advantages in emission reduction while also effectively controlling N2O and CH4 emissions. This study provides a scientific basis for the efficient return of slurry to the field and the development of emission reduction strategies, which helps promote the green and low-carbon development of agriculture.

     

/

返回文章
返回