江汉平原多年生稻种植对土壤团聚体稳定性和有机碳的短期影响

Short-term effects of perennial rice cultivation on soil aggregate stability and organic carbon in the Jianghan Plain

  • 摘要: 江汉平原是我国南方水稻主产区, 长期稻作连作与高频耕作导致土壤团聚体结构退化, 削弱了有机碳的物理保护, 加速了其矿化流失, 进而制约了土壤肥力的持续提升与农田固碳潜力的发挥。探讨不同种植模式下多年生稻对土壤团聚体稳定性和土壤有机碳的影响, 可为优化江汉平原农田耕作管理措施和土壤固碳减排提供理论依据。本研究于2024年在湖北省荆州市开展大田试验, 采用裂区试验设计, 主区为2种“一种两收”种植模式(常规和刈割模式), 裂区为4个水稻品种多年生稻品种‘云大25’ (PR25)和‘云大109’ (PR109), 本地再生稻品种‘丰两优香1号’ (FLY)和‘野香优油丝’ (YXY)。通过测定表层(0~20 cm)和亚表层(20~40 cm)土壤团聚体组分和有机碳含量, 分析不同种植模式与种植水稻品种条件下土壤团聚体稳定性、地下碳输入与有机碳含量间的关系。结果表明, 与种植本地再生稻(FLY和YXY)相比, 刈割模式下种植多年生稻‘PR109’的表层和亚表层土壤>2 mm团聚体有机碳含量显著提升20.99%~142.50%, >2 mm团聚体质量分数增加7.03%~22.90%, 土壤有机碳含量显著提高22.00%~124.63%, 团聚体平均质量直径显著提高5.05%~17.10%, 土壤可蚀性因子则显著降低。常规模式下, 种植PR109的亚表层土壤对各土壤指标的影响总体高于表层土壤。两种种植模式下, 种植多年生稻(PR25和PR109)的地下碳输入比种植本地再生稻(FLY和YXY)提高33.84%~80.49%; 在表层土壤中, 土壤有机碳含量与地下碳输入呈极显著正相关(P<0.01), 说明地下碳输入的增加有助于表层土壤有机碳的积累。此外, 土壤团聚体稳定性指标(团聚体平均质量直径和团聚体几何平均直径)与土壤可蚀性因子呈极显著负相关, 表明团聚体结构对土壤抗侵蚀能力具有重要调控作用。综上, 相较于种植本低再生稻, 种植多年生稻PR109能够显著提升土壤团聚体稳定性和土壤有机碳含量, 同时结合刈割模式能进一步提升水土保持和固碳效益。

     

    Abstract: The Jianghan Plain is a major rice-producing region in southern China. Long-term continuous rice cropping and high-frequency tillage have led to the degradation of soil aggregate structure, weakening the physical protection of organic carbon and accelerating its mineralization and loss, thereby constraining the sustainable improvement of soil fertility and the realization of farmland carbon sequestration potential. Investigating the effects of different planting modes of perennial rice varieties on soil aggregate stability and soil organic carbon can provide a theoretical basis for optimizing farmland tillage management practices and promoting soil carbon sequestration and emission reduction in the Jianghan Plain. A field experiment was conducted in Jingzhou City, Hubei Province in 2024, using a split-plot design. The main plots consisted of two “one planting, two harvests” planting modes (i.e conventional and mowing modes), and the subplots included two perennial rice varieties ‘Yunda 25’ (PR25) and ‘Yunda 109’ (PR109), and two ratoon rice varieties ‘Fengliangyouxiang 1’ (FLY) and ‘Yexiangyouyousi’ (YXY). By determining soil aggregate fractions and soil organic carbon content in the surface layer (0–20 cm) and subsurface soil layer (20–40 cm), the relationships among aggregate stability, belowground carbon input, and soil organic carbon under different planting modes and rice varieties were analyzed. The results were showed as below. Under the mowing mode, compared with planting ratoon rice varieties (FLY and YXY), organic carbon content in >2 mm aggregates, mass percentage of >2 mm aggregates, soil organic carbon content, and the mean weight diameter of aggregates with planting PR109 (the perennial rice variety) significantly increased by 20.99%–142.50%, 7.03%–22.90%, 22.00%–124.63%, and 5.05%–17.10%, respectively, for both surface and subsurface soil layer, while the soil erodibility factor decreased significantly. Under conventional mode, the effect of planting PR109 on various soil indicators in subsurface soil layer were generally higher than that in surface soil layer. Under conventional and mowing modes, the belowground carbon input with planting perennial rice varieties (PR25 and PR109) was 33.84%–80.49% higher than that with planting ratoon rice varieties (FLY and YXY). In the surface soil layer, soil organic carbon content was significantly correlated with belowground carbon input (P<0.01), indicating that increased belowground carbon input facilitated the accumulation of soil organic carbon. Soil aggregate stability indicators (geometric mean diameter of aggregate and mean weight diameter of aggregate) were signicantly negatively correlated with the soil erodibility factor (K). This suggests that aggregate structure plays an important regulatory role in soil erosion resistance. In conclusion, the perennial rice variety PR109 can significantly improve soil aggregate stability and soil organic carbon content, and combining it with the mowing mode can further enhance soil and water conservation and carbon sequestration benefits.

     

/

返回文章
返回